Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorCrawford, Robert
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Donald
dc.coverage.spatialxii, 303 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-22T12:25:11Z
dc.date.available2016-01-22T12:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-14
dc.identifieruk.bl.ethos.678189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/8059
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this thesis is to arrive at a characterisation of twentieth century poetry and science by means of a detailed study of the work of four poets who engaged extensively with science and whose writing lives spanned the greater part of the period. The study of science in the work of the four chosen poets, Hugh MacDiarmid (1892 – 1978), Judith Wright (1915 – 2000), Edwin Morgan (1920 – 2010), and Miroslav Holub (1923 – 1998), is preceded by a literature survey and an initial theoretical chapter. This initial part of the thesis outlines the interdisciplinary history of the academic subject of poetry and science, addressing, amongst other things, the challenges presented by the episodes known as the ‘two cultures’ and the ‘science wars’. Seeking to offer a perspective on poetry and science more aligned to scientific materialism than is typical in the interdiscipline, a systemic challenge to Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is put forward in the first chapter. Additionally, the founding work of poetry and science, I. A. Richards’s Science and Poetry (1926), is assessed both in the context in which it was written, and from a contemporary viewpoint; and, as one way to understand science in poetry, a theory of the creative misreading of science is developed, loosely based on Harold Bloom’s The Anxiety of Influence (1973). The detailed study of science in poetry commences in Chapter II with Hugh MacDiarmid’s late work in English, dating from his period on the Shetland Island of Whalsay (1933 – 1941). The thesis in this chapter is that this work can be seen as a radical integration of poetry and science; this concept is considered in a variety of ways including through a computational model, originally suggested by Robert Crawford. The Australian poet Judith Wright, the subject of Chapter III, is less well known to poetry and science, but a detailed engagement with physics can be identified, including her use of four-dimensional imagery, which has considerable support from background evidence. Biology in her poetry is also studied in the light of recent work by John Holmes. In Chapter IV, science in the poetry of Edwin Morgan is discussed in terms of its origin and development, from the perspective of the mythologised science in his science fiction poetry, and from the ‘hard’ technological perspective of his computer poems. Morgan’s work is cast in relief by readings which are against the grain of some but not all of his published comments. The thesis rounds on its theme of materialism with the fifth and final chapter which studies the work of Miroslav Holub, a poet and practising scientist in communist-era Prague. Holub’s work, it is argued, represents a rare and important literary expression of scientific materialism. The focus on materialism in the thesis is not mechanistic, nor exclusive of the domain of the imagination; instead it frames the contrast between the original science and the transformed poetic version. The thesis is drawn together in a short conclusion.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.relationHugh MacDiarmiden_US
dc.relationJudith Wrighten_US
dc.relationEdwin Morganen_US
dc.relationMiroslav Holuben_US
dc.subjectThomas Kuhnen_US
dc.subjectParadigm theoryen_US
dc.subjectI. A. Richardsen_US
dc.subjectScience and poetryen_US
dc.subjectCognitive poeticsen_US
dc.subjectCommunismen_US
dc.subjectAboriginal rightsen_US
dc.subjectAustralian poetryen_US
dc.subjectComputationalen_US
dc.subjectComputeren_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectPoetry and politicsen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory poemsen_US
dc.subjectQuantum mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectRelativityen_US
dc.subjectScience warsen_US
dc.subjectAlan Sokalen_US
dc.subjectCreative misreading of scienceen_US
dc.subjectJohn Holmesen_US
dc.subjectBergsonen_US
dc.subjectJungen_US
dc.subjectLife forceen_US
dc.subjectTwo culturesen_US
dc.subjectPragueen_US
dc.subjectCommunist eraen_US
dc.subjectMacDiarmiden_US
dc.subjectWrighten_US
dc.subjectMorganen_US
dc.subjectHoluben_US
dc.subjectPoetry and scienceen_US
dc.subjectMcKinneyen_US
dc.subjectKarel Capeken_US
dc.subjectJaroslav Haseken_US
dc.subjectWeinbergen_US
dc.subject.lccPN1083.S43G5
dc.subject.lcshLiterature and science--History--20th centuryen_US
dc.subject.lcshPoetry, Modern--20th century--History and criticismen_US
dc.subject.lcshMacDiarmid, Hugh, 1892-1978--Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.lcshWright, Judith, 1915-2000--Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.lcshMorgan, Edwin, 1920-2010--Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.lcshHolub, Miroslav--Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.titleTwentieth-century poetry and science : science in the poetry of Hugh MacDiarmid, Judith Wright, Edwin Morgan, and Miroslav Holuben_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record