Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorRogers, Alex, 1968-
dc.contributor.advisorClark, Melody
dc.contributor.advisorBrierley, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorFitzcharles, Elaine M.
dc.coverage.spatialxi, 185 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-24T09:15:27Z
dc.date.available2015-06-24T09:15:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/6860
dc.description.abstractCorrect species identification is fundamental to all areas of biology, but particularly the policy related areas of conservation and fisheries management. To enable guidelines to be developed for environmental management and conservation, such identifications need links to studies of the evolutionary history, biological factors and environmental influences driving species divergence and population dynamics for the target species. This study concerns two genera of gadiform fish, Muraenolepis and Macrourus, found in southern temperate and Antarctic waters, with a single species, Macrourus berglax, present in the North Atlantic. With similar distribution patterns to toothfish species, Dissostichus eleginoides and D. mawsoni, they are a major food source and by-catch of the toothfish fishery. Both are slow growing and long lived, with different evolutionary histories, life expectancies and strategies for reproduction. For both genera, the accuracy of morphological keys, number of described species and their distribution is under debate. This study has identified specimens to species level using both morphological and genetic techniques, redefining the range for morphological features and taxonomic keys. For Muraenolepis, this has clarified confusion over Mu. marmoratus and Mu. microps being a single species, confirmed some mis-identification from sexual dimorphism and provided genetic evidence for the recently described species Mu. evseenkoi. For Macrourus, this work has identified a new species, now named Ma. caml, and found that Ma. holotrachys and Ma. berglax are genetically identical, raising the question of bipolar distribution or recent divergence. The low level of genetic variation within both species suggests a recent evolution and expansion into Antarctic waters. Similar geographic species limits imply common processes influencing divergence, with the oceanographic fronts as potential barriers. Further investigation of niche overlap and fine scale population structure are required to fully understand the processes driving speciation and provide the underlying data required for fisheries management.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectAntarcticaen_US
dc.subjectPopulation geneticsen_US
dc.subjectFisheriesen_US
dc.subjectIntegrative taxonomyen_US
dc.subjectDNA barcodingen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectGadiformesen_US
dc.subject.lccQL637.2F5
dc.subject.lcshFishes--Antarcticaen_US
dc.subject.lcshPopulation geneticsen_US
dc.subject.lcshBiodiversity--Antarcticaen_US
dc.titleGenetic diversity of Antarctic fishen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorBritish Antarctic Surveyen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentBritish Antarctic Surveyen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record