Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorSanghera, Gurchathen
dc.contributor.advisorMcCallum, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorBernhoff, Arthur
dc.coverage.spatial461en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-02T14:47:10Z
dc.date.available2015-06-02T14:47:10Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-23
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/6729
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates Hizb’allah’s successful but competing dual development as an extra-institutional Shi’a social movement and an institutional political party. Hizb’allah has traditionally been studied from the perspective of one of its many natures, such as a social movement, Islamic movement, resistance, or political party, each perspective bringing with it limitations and differing interpretations of its identity, motivations, and success. The motivation behind this research was to seek an interpretation of the movement’s development and success that would encompass these multiple natures. Through an interpretation of social movement ‘life-cycles’, a social movement ‘development model’ is proposed that accounts for contradicting theories on the ‘success’ of social movements, interpreting success instead as an ability to exhibit simultaneous institutional and extra-institutional natures. The hypothesis provided in this work is that it is an ability to simultaneously exhibit institutional and extra-institutional natures that can be a source of strength and success for a movement, drawing capital from both while avoiding accountability that typically accompanies institutional politics. This challenges traditional theoretical approaches in terms of linear life-cycles with few paths for the social movement to choose from. In turn, questions arise regarding notions of social movement life-cycles being uni-directional, continuously progressing towards ‘institutionalization’ or demise. Ideas of an ‘end-date’ or ‘inevitable outcome’ of social movements are also confronted. This interdisciplinary study is conducted by means of media, archival, and empirical research (participant observation, interviews, and surveys), focusing on changing constituent perceptions of the movement between 1985 and 2013. It is also argued that Hizb’allah’s strength is its ability to draw from both extra-institutional and institutional resources while simultaneously avoiding accountability. However, it was also found that, by forming the 2011 governing coalition, the movement upset this balance by subjecting itself to accountability inherent in governance, in turn leading to ‘schizophrenic behaviour’ as Hizb’allah sought to serve conflicting constituent and state interests. The significance of this research is that it not only provides an explanation for Hizb’allah’s success, but also provides an interpretation of social movement development that accounts for multi-natured movements.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectHizb'allahen_US
dc.subjectHezbollahen_US
dc.subjectSocial movementsen_US
dc.subjectInstitutionalizationen_US
dc.subjectLife-cycleen_US
dc.subjectSocial movement developmenten_US
dc.subjectLebanonen_US
dc.subjectShi'aen_US
dc.subjectIslamic movementen_US
dc.subjectPolitical partyen_US
dc.subjectSocial movement successen_US
dc.subjectSocial movement institutionalizationen_US
dc.subjectInstitutionalisationen_US
dc.subjectInstitutionalen_US
dc.subjectExtra-institutionalen_US
dc.subjectSocial movement accountabilityen_US
dc.subjectAccountabilityen_US
dc.subjectSchizophrenic behaviouren_US
dc.subjectMulti-natured social movementsen_US
dc.subjectResistance movementen_US
dc.subjectResource mobilizationen_US
dc.subjectSocial capitalen_US
dc.subjectPolitical capitalen_US
dc.subjectNew social movementsen_US
dc.subjectMiddle-rangeen_US
dc.subjectSuccessen_US
dc.subjectSocial movement successen_US
dc.subjectSocial movement failureen_US
dc.subjectIdentity reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectIdentity reassessmenten_US
dc.subjectPolitical participationen_US
dc.subjectSocial service provisionen_US
dc.subjectSocial servicesen_US
dc.subject.lccJQ1828.A98H5B4
dc.subject.lcshHizballah (Lebanon)--Historyen_US
dc.subject.lcshSocial movements--Lebanonen_US
dc.subject.lcshLebanon--Politics and government--1975-en_US
dc.titleStrength in a weakened state : interpreting Hizb’allah’s experiences as a social movement and governing coalition in Lebanon 1985-2013en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2020-05-19en_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 19th May 2020en_US


The following license files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record