Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorSutton, Emma
dc.contributor.authorSriratana, Verita
dc.coverage.spatial306en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-03T09:04:32Z
dc.date.available2013-04-03T09:04:32Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/3458
dc.description.abstractThis thesis offers an analysis of selected works by Virginia Woolf through the theoretical framework of technology of place. The term “technology”, meaning both a finished product and an ongoing production process, a mode of concealment and unconcealment in Martin Heidegger’s sense, is used as part of this thesis’s argument that place can be understood through constant negotiations of concrete place perceived through the senses, a concept based on the Heideggerian notion of “earth”, and abstract place perceived in the imagination, a concept based on the Heideggerian notion of “world”. The term “technology of place”, coined by Irvin C. Schick in The Erotic Margin: Sexuality and Spatiality in Alteritist Discourse (1999), is appropriated and re-interpreted as part of this thesis’s adoption and adaptation of Woolf’s notion of ideal biographical writing as an amalgamation of “granite” biographical facts and “rainbow” internal life. Woolf’s granite and rainbow dichotomy is used as a foreground to this thesis’s proposed theoretical framework, through which questions of space/place can be examined. My analysis of Flush (1933) demonstrates that place is a technology which can be taken at face value and, at the same time, appropriated to challenge the ideology of its construction. My analysis of Orlando (1928) demonstrates that Woolf’s idea of utopia exemplifies the technological “coming together”, in Heidegger’s term, of concrete social reality and abstract artistic fantasy. My analysis of The Years (1937) demonstrates that sense of place as well as sense of identity is ambivalent and constantly changing like the weather, reflecting place’s Janus-faced function as both concealment and unconcealment. Lastly, my analysis of Woolf’s selected essays and marginalia illustrates that writing can serve as a revolutionary “place-making” technology through which one can mentally “make room” for (re-)imagining the lives of “the obscure”, often placed in oblivion throughout the course of history.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of St Andrews
dc.relationVirginia Woolfen_US
dc.relationMartin Heideggeren_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectVirginia Woolfen_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectMartin Heideggeren_US
dc.subjectPlaceen_US
dc.subjectSpaceen_US
dc.subjectModernismen_US
dc.subject.lccPR6045.O66Z5S85
dc.subject.lcshWoolf, Virginia, 1882-1941--Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.lcshHeidegger, Martin, 1889-1976en_US
dc.subject.lcshPlace (Philosophy) in literatureen_US
dc.subject.lcshSetting (Literature)en_US
dc.subject.lcshModernism (Literature)en_US
dc.title"Making room" for one's own : Virginia Woolf and technology of placeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorAnandamahidol Foundation under the Royal Patronage of HM the King of Thailanden_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodateElectronic copy restricted until 6th February 2018en_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulationsen_US


The following licence files are associated with this item:

  • Creative Commons

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported