Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorTalajooy, Saeed
dc.contributor.advisorNevader, Madhavi
dc.contributor.authorDavar Ghalati, Vahid
dc.coverage.spatial209en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-21T09:44:06Z
dc.date.available2025-02-21T09:44:06Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/31454
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the myth of Jamshid and Zahhāk as a narrative that has reflected and influenced the depictions of the ideals and pitfalls of rulership in Persian literature from historical times to the modern era. It posits that Iranians’ collective desires and fears have shaped and, in turn, have been informed by the story of a sun-like benevolent king and his overthrow by a malevolent dragon-like tyrant. The study scrutinises the evolution of these mythic figures as doppelgängers and their metaphorical reappearance in literary depictions that cast ruling figures in their image or use them to warn about the pitfalls of power. A review of various sources, including the Avesta, the Shahnameh, and several medieval texts, such as mirrors for princes, provides an exhaustive view of the influence of the myth and its versions on Iranian perceptions of leadership and authority. The detailed examination of the medieval texts and a romance recorded in the nineteenth century reveals the recurring narrative of these mythic figures and their symbolic significance in shaping conceptions of kingship. The thesis further examines the repercussions of the myth in modern and contemporary literature by explaining how Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (r. 1941–79), the last shah of Iran, and Ruhollah Khomeini (r. 1979–1989), the founder of the Islamic Republic, have been cast within this mythological framework. Incorporating theoretical lenses from Carl Gustav Jung, post-Jungian scholars, Northrop Frye, and Ernst Cassirer, this research analyses the myth’s complex linguistic, psychological, theological, political, and aesthetic dimensions. The transformation of the Jamshid-Zahhāk myth reflects the transition from a double-natured king-priest in ancient Iranian mythology to a Perso-Semitic priest-king in today’s political and literary discourse in Iran. In its conclusion, the thesis asserts the need for innovative perspectives in the study of ancient myths and their adaptations, emphasising the Jamshid-Zahhāk myth’s relevance today.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectIranian mythologyen_US
dc.subjectJamshid and Zahhaken_US
dc.subjectThe double-natured kingen_US
dc.subjectMohammad Reza Pahlavien_US
dc.subjectRuhollah Khomeinien_US
dc.subjectKing-priesten_US
dc.subjectPriest-kingen_US
dc.subjectCollective unconsciousen_US
dc.subjectPersian literatureen_US
dc.subjectShah-imamen_US
dc.subjectDoppelgängeren_US
dc.subjectKingshipen_US
dc.titleA mythological study of the conceptions of kingship in the Iranian imagination : the double-natured king-priest from Jamshid and Zahhāk to Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and Ruhollah Khomeinien_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. Douglas and Gordon Bonnyman Scholarshipen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2030-02-12
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 12th February 2030
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/1238


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record