Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorMiller, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorHartvig, Eva Christel
dc.coverage.spatial102en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-22T19:54:16Z
dc.date.available2012-09-22T19:54:16Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/3139
dc.description.abstractThough direct experiments to test echolocation in sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) remain impossible, the indirect evidence is overwhelming that one function of their clicks is echolocation used during foraging, as has been shown for other toothed whales. In this thesis, the aim was to test: 1) the hypothesis by Fristrup and Harbison (2002) that the sperm whale might be using downwelling light during the day to spot prey or prey patches as silhouettes against the lighter sea surface. 2) A second hypothesis by Fristrup and Harbison (2002) suggested that the sperm whales use vision to look for bioluminescence in prey at depth, or during the night when no light is available. 3) Indications that the sperm whales changed their roll-behaviour, rolling more extensively when they were producing regular clicks during the descent as well as for the ascent. Data from 51 sperm whales tagged in the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic, the Mediterranean and northern Norway, were tested to explore how large a proportion of the bottom-interval the whales spent at angles where they were able to see towards the lighter sea surface at three different pitch-modes while either searching or buzzing, for each dive. The majority of whales were found to be swimming predominantly upside down or on the side during both the day and night time. The whales were not found to change the way they use roll at night compared to the day time, when looking at the bottom-interval when the whales were both searching for prey and buzzing. Looking at another function for roll and a possible association with the echolocation of the sperm whales, it was found that during the descent, the whales had a tendency to have a higher variance of roll when they were producing regular clicks. A very similar trend showed for the ascent-phase as well, that they seemed to roll more when clicking compared to when they were not, before they reached the sea surface. These analyses of the roll-behaviour of sperm whales used to test the hypotheses put forward by Fristrup and Harbison do not seem to support the use of vision to detect prey during foraging at depth, but might indicate that the sperm whale was intentionally changing its roll-behaviour, when they were producing regular clicks during the ascent and descent-phase in the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Norway.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccQL737.C435H2
dc.subject.lcshSperm whale--Behavioren_US
dc.subject.lcshSperm whale--Vocalizationen_US
dc.subject.lcshSperm whale--Fooden_US
dc.subject.lcshEcholocation (Physiology)en_US
dc.titleThe function of roll in foraging behaviour of sperm whalesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnameMPhil Master of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record