Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorDavis, Alex
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Trefor Abraham
dc.coverage.spatial211en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T09:22:57Z
dc.date.available2024-08-14T09:22:57Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/30390
dc.description.abstract‘“The Ghostlie Eye of Thy Soule”: Literary Souls & Ghosts in the Early Modern Period’ comprises four case-studies of the early modern soul in different literary contexts. Each focuses upon how literature thinks through and represents the difficult relationship of this immaterial entity with the entire person of which it is a part and with the material field it must transcend. For the soul and body dialogue tradition it is axiomatic that its two interlocutors are separate, yet it also seems eager to interrogate that assumption; in chapter 1 we examine two instances of the genre, one Anglo-Saxon and one early modern, that do so in especially literary ways. Chapter 2 reads side-by-side John Donne’s Anniversary poems and René Descartes’ Discourse on Method. In both texts a soul that transcends matter rescues a fatally undermined material scene, and here there emerges a rather more optimistic impression of the soul’s capacities. But by contrast once more, chapter 3 turns to a soul conceived in terms not of transcendence but of abjection. It works first to locate the apparently devotional inner moment in which an author addresses their own soul within the burgeoning early modern literature of discipline; subsequently, it argues that when this moment occurs specifically in the lyric mode it makes demands upon the reader that locate it in more transhistorical disciplinary traditions as well. The final chapter considers Hamlet. Central to the play is a ghostly soul that transcends the material body and rescues the self from death. Yet Hamlet also fixates upon the relations of that soul to the material world of Elsinore, and returns repeatedly by way of an interest in atomistic natural philosophy to the possibility that in being immaterial the soul might in fact not exist at all.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"I register first my gratitude to the Arts & Humanities Research Council/Scottish Graduate School of the Arts & Humanities for the grant that funded this thesis and without which it would not have been written. My thanks also to the University of St Andrews for funding the period after the end of that original scholarship."--Acknowledgementsen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lccPR428.S68D2
dc.subject.lcshDonne, John, 1572-1631--Criticism and interpretationen
dc.subject.lcshDescartes, René, 1596-1650--Criticism and interpretationen
dc.subject.lcshShakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet--Criticism and interpretationen
dc.subject.lcshEnglish literature--Early modern, 1500-1700--History and criticismen
dc.subject.lcshSoul in literatureen
dc.subject.lcshGhosts in literatureen
dc.title'The ghostlie eye of thy soule' : literary souls & ghosts in the early modern perioden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrewsen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2024-07-10
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 10 Jul 2024en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/1071


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record