Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorMurer, Jeffrey Stevenson
dc.contributor.advisorFierke, K. M. (Karin M.)
dc.contributor.authorBurkhardt-Vetter, Olga Liselotte
dc.coverage.spatial177en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-24T11:39:10Z
dc.date.available2024-05-24T11:39:10Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29925
dc.description.abstractOn June 10, 1944, Waffen-SS troops slaughtered 218 inhabitants of Distomo, killing primarily children, women, and the elderly in a reprisal for partisan activity nearby. The Distomo massacre represents one of the most brutal war crimes perpetrated by German forces during the German occupation of Greece (1941-1944). Drawing on qualitative in-depth interviews conducted in Distomo in 2018, this thesis explores the lived experience of the massacre by people in Distomo. It seeks to understand how the violence has affected this community, both intra- and inter-generationally. Further, it explores how they have experienced the German state’s response to the massacre. Whilst Germany has come to be regarded internationally as a model of coming to terms with a history of political injustices, the case of the Distomo massacre was met with political denial and evasion of responsibility by the German state and continues to strain Greek-German relations. Drawing on Daniel Philpott’s Ethic of Political Reconciliation (2012) as a theoretical framework, particularly on his differentiation between different dimensions of woundedness inflicted by political violence, this thesis offers a theoretically informed and empirically grounded contribution to what may explain the absence of genuine Greek-German reconciliation in the case of Distomo. Whilst the notion of the ‘intent to destroy’ is a defining feature of genocidal violence, people in Distomo perceived an explicit intent to destroy on the part of the German forces with regard to the violence inflicted on them. This finding arguably has significant implications for the types of political response such violence warrants in its aftermath, and the avenues of redressing the multidimensional wounds inflicted. In short, this thesis argues that the German state’s response to the Greek chapter of its Nazi legacy and the absence of a restorative politics has not only curbed Greek-German reconciliation but proven injurious in and of itself.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). The University of St Andrews provided complementary funding at various stages of this project. This work was also supported by the Russell Trust, a Santander Mobility Award, and the University of St Andrews’ School of International Relations Conference and Fieldwork Fund, which all supported field research in relation to this doctoral project."--Fundingen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDistomo massacreen_US
dc.subjectGerman occupation of Greeceen_US
dc.subjectTransgenerational traumaen_US
dc.subjectMemoryen_US
dc.subjectReconciliationen_US
dc.subjectGreek-German relationsen_US
dc.subjectReparationsen_US
dc.subjectMass atrocityen_US
dc.subjectMartyred villages Greeceen_US
dc.subjectPolitical violenceen_US
dc.subjectDaniel Philpotten_US
dc.titleTowards a restorative politics : unrecognised wounds and the struggle for Greek-German reconciliation in the case of the Distomo massacreen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrewsen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorRussell Trusten_US
dc.contributor.sponsorSantander UK. Santander Universities. Research Mobility Awarden_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2029-05-23
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 23 May 2029en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/926


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record