Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorStojanovic, Tim
dc.contributor.advisorWarren, Charles
dc.contributor.authorGorjanc, Sašo
dc.description.abstractMarine biodiversity is diminishing globally. Due to the extent and transboundary nature of the seas, effective conservation can best be achieved through international cooperation and policies. The European Union (EU) has developed some of the most stringent, but also complex marine environmental policy frameworks in the world. However, their implementation has remained inconsistent and poorly coordinated. The gravity of the biodiversity crisis requires better implementation of policy objectives, if current targets are to be achieved. While most previous research has focussed on provision of better data and on supporting coordination activities, this study focusses on the social constructions held by key actors involved in EU policy interpretation and implementation. The new generation of ambitious EU conservation targets often provokes contentious ideas linked to the resurgence of wilderness discourses. This study combined three major phases of research to understand these issues. Firstly, a combination of interviews, literature and EU policy analysis were used to explore how key EU policy actors perceive the concepts of marine nature and wilderness, what their personal policy priorities are and why. Secondly, a Q methodological study identified the prevailing social constructions among policy actors. Thirdly, the identified social constructions were subsequently explored and validated further in Living Q workshops with key actors representing all EU Regional Seas. The thesis explores the differing social constructions of marine wilderness and nature amongst policy actors, and how these shape and are shaped by EU policies designed to achieve strict or effective protection of marine nature. The research revealed six distinct social constructions, and considerable divergence between the discourses used in policy texts and those employed by the key actors. The influence of these six social constructions on the understandings of science-policy interfaces and policy implementation are discussed. The results highlight a considerable challenge for the future implementation of EU marine conservation policies, and the thesis argues that this underlying diversity of perceptions needs to be recognised and engaged with.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This work was supported by Ad Futura Scholarship (Public Scholarship, Development Disability and Maintenance Fund of the Republic of Slovenia, contract no: 11010-346/2020). This work was supported by Robertson Scholarship (University of St Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development)."--Acknowledgementsen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.subjectSocial constructionsen_US
dc.subject.lcshMarine biodiversity conservation--Europeen
dc.titleMarine protection in the European Union : how do social constructions of marine wilderness and nature influence policy?en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorRepublic of Slovenia. Public Scholarship, Development and Disability Maintenance Fund. Ad Futura Scholarshipen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. Robertson Trust Scholarshipen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US

The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International