Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorLehr, Peter
dc.contributor.advisorArgomaniz, Javier
dc.contributor.authorCarmini, Maurizio
dc.coverage.spatial289en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-05T11:44:35Z
dc.date.available2024-03-05T11:44:35Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-14
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29431
dc.description.abstractThe Mediterranean Sea has long been a stage for complex interactions between the requirements of maritime security and the dynamics of irregular migration. This interrelationship has recently become more pronounced, with the unfolding of the refugee and migrant crisis on the doorstep of the European Union. Despite the support for missions at sea, EU stakeholders have shown conflicting interests in supporting different models of maritime operations. Mission Mare Nostrum, a purely Italian state-led initiative, was enacted in 2013 to rescue migrants in the Mediterranean Sea and reduce migrant smuggling and trafficking. This research seeks to examine the effectiveness of combining search and rescue maritime missions and pro-security operations in order to save lives and reduce migrant smuggling. Mare Nostrum combined the two approaches in response to the migration crisis, and thus was a suitable case study to highlight the value and efficacy of maritime security operations and their interconnection with irregular migration. Through an analytical framework which could be applied to evaluating similar missions, this study assessed how Mare Nostrum has shaped subsequent maritime operations in the Mediterranean Sea since 2013, and redefined policies around such operations. Using a qualitative case study method guided by an abductive approach and interpretive paradigm, data gleaned from documentary analysis and interviews show that Mare Nostrum was effective in reducing fatalities at sea, smuggling, and trafficking of migrants. The findings of this research also illustrate that, although the operation was sufficiently funded, it could not eradicate migrant smuggling and trafficking because other underlying aspects – such as political instability, civil insecurity, and socioeconomic issues – were critical push factors for irregular migration. The main conclusion drawn from this study is that more collaboration amongst stakeholders in the EU and neighbouring countries is needed to find lasting solutions because deploying maritime operations alone is not an adequate response to end the cross-Mediterranean migration crisis. In the hope of ultimately contributing to knowledge regarding European maritime security studies, this thesis recommends new policies at the international level for addressing irregular migration by sea through maritime operations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectCross-Mediterranean migration crisisen_US
dc.subjectHumanitarianen_US
dc.subjectImmigrationen_US
dc.subjectEUen_US
dc.subjectMaritime lawen_US
dc.subjectMare Nostrumen_US
dc.subjectSearch and rescue maritime operationsen_US
dc.subjectMigrantsen_US
dc.subjectRefugeesen_US
dc.subjectSecurityen_US
dc.subjectHuman traffickingen_US
dc.subjectFrontexen_US
dc.subjectItalyen_US
dc.titleMission 'Mare Nostrum', 2013–2014 : a framework of analysis for maritime search and rescue operationsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/807


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record