Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorPuyou, François-Régis
dc.contributor.advisorFerguson, John
dc.contributor.authorMcVey, Marisa Cait
dc.coverage.spatial289en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T15:43:39Z
dc.date.available2024-02-16T15:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29277
dc.description.abstractAttempts to ensure corporate accountability for human rights are numerous and diverse. The UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) have become the reference point for businesses to demonstrate their understanding of human rights responsibilities and enhance corporate accountability through human rights due diligence (HRDD). The UNGPs, which are ostensibly a soft law initiative, have inspired numerous global and national policies, and are being increasingly ‘hardened’ through national and supranational legislation. Precisely because of their popularity and endorsement, it is imperative that a critical analysis of their application is undertaken. However, at present there is a lack of empirical research that draws attention to how the UNGPs are implemented within the corporate context, or on the role of external human rights experts in this process. In order to provide insights into this aspect of their implementation, this exploratory study draws on two multinational case studies – an oil and gas company and a bank. The research utilises a conceptual framework informed by the social practice of accountability, and is underpinned by a social constructionist qualitative methodological research design. Findings suggest that translating human rights through the UNGPs into the corporate space is both a challenging and iterative exercise, which can lead to instances were human rights are regarded as manageable objects rather than realised. External experts must respond to a range of legitimacy claims to become experts in the business and human rights ecosystem, and while doing so may confer legitimacy onto MNCs’ human rights practices. Their roles are diverse and impactful and the expert industry itself appears to be increasingly competitive, as new actors enter this space. As such, this research provides a much-needed contribution to the expansion of interdisciplinary inquiry into business and human rights issues, evaluating the use of the UNGPs as an accountability mechanism and on the realities and nuances of ‘doing’ corporate accountability for human rights.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccHD60.M3
dc.subject.lcshUnited Nations Human Rights Councilen
dc.subject.lcshSocial responsibility of businessen
dc.subject.lcshHuman rightsen
dc.titleThe "business of human rights"? Exploring the social practice of corporate accountability under the UN guiding principles on business and human rightsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Graduate School of Social Science (SGSSS)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorThe Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2029-05-25
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 25 May 2029
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/776
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/J500136/1en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record