Visual commonplacing : the transmission and reception of printed devotional images in Reformed England
Abstract
This thesis introduces the framework of ‘visual commonplacing’ as a way of analysing the
repeating illustrations printed in early modern English books and ephemera. This research
focuses on religious relief-cut images printed in the post-Reformation Tudor years and the
printers, publishers and readers who copied and reused illustrations. By situating this practice
within material, print and religious history we discover that copying was not uninspired or
derivative but functioned within a wider memory culture, where imitation was a function of
invention. Moreover, in a period marked by flashpoints of iconoclasm, repeating a religious
image already circulating in state-authorised print was a prudent choice for book producers.
This study begins by exploring the economic motivations for recycling images and traces
the most highly copied illustrations of the period from the earliest days of the Reformation to the
end of the Tudor period. The next chapter examines the alteration of woodcuts in the print shop,
showing how blocks were not fixed, but mutable surfaces where images could be reused while
replacing aspects of the iconography no longer acceptable in the current climate. Moving away
from workshop practices, the third chapter unpacks how repeating images served the mnemonic
aims of the book, by building specific meaning and associations through repetition. This is
followed by an investigation into how publishers exploited the echo chamber of early modern
print to circulate polemic images, furthering divisive religious strategies. Finally, we consider
how readers used the images printed in their books and broadsides in their own visual
commonplacing, by examining manuscript and embroidered copies and illustrations cut from one
work and repurposed in another. This thesis challenges past critiques that derided copying by
centring recycling on agents, detailing the creative and cognitive flexibility exhibited by visual
commonplacers.
Type
Thesis, PhD Doctor of Philosophy
Rights
Embargo Date: 2027-02-27
Embargo Reason: Thesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 27th February 2027
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.