St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Medicine (School of)
  • Medicine
  • Medicine Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Medicine (School of)
  • Medicine
  • Medicine Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Medicine (School of)
  • Medicine
  • Medicine Theses
  • View Item
  • Register / Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation of the tuberculosis-molecular bacterial load assay for tuberculosis diagnosis and monitoring response to standard anti-tuberculosis therapy

View/Open
Thesis-Emmanuel-Musisi-complete-version.pdf (11.24Mb)
Date
16/06/2023
Author
Musisi, Emmanuel
Supervisor
Sabiiti, Wilber
Gillespie, S. H.
Funder
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP). PanACEA II
Makerere University Research and Innovation Fund (MakRIF)
University of St Andrews. St Leonard's College Scholarship
Scottish Funding Council
Grant ID
TR1A2015-1102
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is a difficult disease to treat, requiring a minimum of six months on a combination of four antibiotics. This thesis reports the first systematic evaluation of the St Andrews' developed RNA-based tuberculosis-Molecular Bacterial Load Assay (TB-MBLA) for its accuracy to diagnose tuberculosis and measure treatment response in comparison to current standard-of-care tests. Presumptive TB patients were enrolled in Uganda and assessed for TB using TB-MBLA versus Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) and stained smear fluorescent microscopy (SSM-FM) using sputum MGIT culture as the gold standard and reference test. Out of the 210 presumptive cases, 129 (61.4%) participants tested TB positive on the Xpert-Ultra in the sputum cohort and they were enrolled into the treatment arm and consequently monitored for six months. At baseline, 6/210 (2.9%) sputum MGIT culture results were indeterminate due to contamination, and they were excluded from the calculation of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Sensitivity for TB-MBLA and Xpert-Ultra (95%CI) was 99%(95-100) which was higher compared to 76%(65-83) for SSM-FM. TB-MBLA specificity at 90%(83-96) was higher than the 76%(68-86) for Xpert-Ultra but less than 98%(93-100) for SSM-FM. In the treatment follow-up arm, TB positivity rates reduced for all tests. TB-MBLA positivity reduction was consistent with that of the MGIT culture but different from that of Xpert-Ultra which occurred remarkably slower. Consequently, 31 participants were still Xpert-Ultra positive at the end treatment course. Three-month post treatment follow-up of the 31 Xpert-Ultra positive cases revealed no TB both clinically and on TB-MBLA and MGIT tests. In the stool cohort, TB-MBLA detected TB in 57/100 participants including 49 who were confirmed positive for pTB on sputum MGIT culture. Fifty-seven percent (57%) of the indeterminate stool culture were positive on TB-MBLA. The findings prove that TB-MBLA's potential utility as both a diagnostic and treatment monitoring tool of TB in research and routine healthcare.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/554
Type
Thesis, PhD Doctor of Philosophy
Rights
Embargo Date: 2024-05-08
Embargo Reason: Thesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 8th May 2024
Collections
  • Medicine Theses
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/28035

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter