Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorSaouli, Adham
dc.contributor.authorMurphey, Helen Lu
dc.coverage.spatial237en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-04T10:17:34Z
dc.date.available2023-07-04T10:17:34Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27880
dc.description.abstractAfter the Arab Uprisings, Salafi movements that had previously exalted their separation from mainstream society mobilised to participate in political institutions. This thesis explores how Salafis in post-revolutionary Egypt and Tunisia addressed this development. It answers the following questions: How was the transition from social movement to party managed? What transformations in ideology or identity accompanied this shift? What effects did Salafi participation have on the political opportunity structure? This thesis utilises an across- and within-case study comparison among four Salafi movements: Jabhat al-Islah and Itilaf al-Karama in Tunisia, and Hizb al-Nour and Hazem Salah Abu Ismail in Egypt. It adopts a Social Movement approach treating Salafi movements as imbricated in opportunity structures. Four opportunity variables are analysed: religio-political competition; relations between formal and informal politics, degree of polarisation and revolutionary reform. Using data extracted from the Facebook pages of each Salafi actor, the thesis explores how these variables were discursively interpreted through Salafis’ diagnostic, prognostic and motivational frames. This dissertation finds that Salafis entered formal politics by emphasising either identity or ideology. The first trajectory involved forming a niche party based on ideology to advocate for a strict interpretation of religiosity, while de-emphasising Salafism’s counter-cultural aspects to ally with institutional actors. The other trajectory entailed adopting a populist master frame premised on an ‘outsider’ identity that embraced nationalist and revolutionary logics and reshaped the political field by reworking the secular-elite division into an elite-people dichotomy. This thesis divides into four primary chapters. Chapter One situates the thesis within the literature on Salafism as an identity and ideology. Chapter Two presents the case for a social movement perspective on Salafi politicisation and outlines a typology of political Salafism. Chapters Three and Four discuss the Tunisian and Egyptian cases, presenting a comparative analysis of political Salafis’ responses to opportunity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectIslamismen_US
dc.subjectSalafismen_US
dc.subjectSocial movementsen_US
dc.subjectEgypten_US
dc.subjectTunisiaen_US
dc.subjectPopulismen_US
dc.subjectNiche partiesen_US
dc.titleRepresenting and contesting authenticity : understanding shifts in Salafi ideologies and identities in Tunisia and Egypten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorCarnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotlanden_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2028-06-27
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 27th June 2028en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/532


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International