Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorShuker, David M.
dc.contributor.authorBalfour, Vicki
dc.coverage.spatial330en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T14:38:54Z
dc.date.available2023-06-07T14:38:54Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27755
dc.description.abstractWe should expect mating systems to evolve to maximise the relative fitness of individuals, i.e. through sexual selection acting on individuals to maximise the number of offspring they produce. However, some mating systems can appear to ‘go wrong’. This is when apparently non-adaptive behavioural phenotypes, which cause fitness losses during reproduction, arise, such as same-sex sexual behaviours, reproductive interference, and mating failure. In this thesis I focus on the phenomenon of mating failure – when copulations fail to result in the production of offspring. Recorded levels of mating failure across taxa are non-trivial, and I here investigate the causes of mating failure in Lygaeus simulans seed bugs, a species known to suffer from high levels of failure (40-60%). I first investigated the genetics behind a pale mutant colour morph, which was inherited in a Mendelian fashion, providing a visible genetic marker for the investigation of post-copulatory selection processes. I found that mating failure caused extreme bimodality in second-male paternity, which could lead to misinterpretations of sperm competition mechanisms. I also found a strong link between copulation duration and mating failure, with longer copulations less likely to fail. Additionally, mating failure decreased when pairs were allowed to copulate for longer, or multiple times, indicating it is not primarily due to infertility or mechanical failures. Instead, evidence points towards mating failure being caused by cryptic male choice (CMC). In terms of post-copulatory outcomes, larger females were consistently more likely to lay eggs, have offspring (and hence not experience mating failure) and have more offspring. Males preferred to copulate, and copulate for longer, with larger females, suggesting CMC. Unfortunately, I was unsuccessful at teasing apart male and female effects to definitively demonstrate that mating failure is caused by CMC, but I believe the methods used could be useful in investigating CMC in the future.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relationInvestigating the causes of mating failure in Lygaeus simulans seed bugs (thesis data) Balfour, V., University of St Andrews, 6 Jun 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17630/37154949-85e2-4369-be46-d89bafaf69e5en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.17630/37154949-85e2-4369-be46-d89bafaf69e5
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMating systemsen_US
dc.subjectMating decisionsen_US
dc.subjectLygaeus simulansen_US
dc.subjectCryptic male choiceen_US
dc.subjectMating failureen_US
dc.subjectCryptic female choiceen_US
dc.subjectReproductive interferenceen_US
dc.subjectSperm competitionen_US
dc.subjectColour polymorphismen_US
dc.subjectPleiotropyen_US
dc.subjectSexual selectionen_US
dc.subjectSperm precedenceen_US
dc.subjectHeterospecificen_US
dc.subjectHybridisationen_US
dc.subjectMale mate choiceen_US
dc.subjectMate choiceen_US
dc.subjectInsect reproductionen_US
dc.subjectCryptic mating failureen_US
dc.subjectLygaeus equestrisen_US
dc.subjectPost-copulatory sexual selectionen_US
dc.subjectPre-copulatory sexual selectionen_US
dc.subjectSame sex sexual behaviouren_US
dc.subjectContext-dependenceen_US
dc.subject.lccQL523.L9B2
dc.subject.lcshLygaeidae--Sexual behavior.en
dc.subject.lcshLygaeidae--Generative organsen
dc.subject.lcshLygaeidae--Reproductionen
dc.subject.lcshSexual selection in animalsen
dc.titleInvestigating the causes of mating failure in Lygaeus simulans seed bugsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2024-06-06
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 6th June 2024en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/496


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International