Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorO'Brien, Phillips Payson
dc.contributor.advisorStrachan, Hew
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Matthew Paul
dc.coverage.spatial224en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-11T09:11:52Z
dc.date.available2023-05-11T09:11:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27565
dc.description.abstract‘Strategic air power’ is an operating concept through which air power is arranged and directed to achieve objectives at the strategic level of warfare by exerting control over an adversary. At the end of the Cold War, utilising a new theory of strategic effect, the Desert Storm air campaign demonstrated its power and potential in practice. A question then emerges: how did the concept of strategic air power develop in the post-Cold War period and what factors accounted for its direction? Across five development phases from 1989-2015 this question was addressed from the experiences of six relevant states by determining the underlying process in action, common factors, and an explanatory model. It is based on comparative case study analyses of the United States, Russia, Britain, France, Israel and Australia and their development of strategic air power theories and capabilities, the influence of environmental and national factors, and practice. This thesis finds that a common process of concept development became evident following Desert Storm. This process repeated itself throughout the research period. It also finds that eight common factors shaped the direction of strategic air power. In the early research period, air power transformed in response to a reconceived battlefield and new technology and was reframed as a tool for conventional strategic effect. After Desert Storm precision weapons’ unique role in enabling strategic attack was recognised and applied in successive air campaigns. Development cycles were compressed and sensor-to-shooter timescales improved, creating new options and expectations for strategic effect. Their limits were exposed by adaptive adversaries and complexity, leading to a divergence of agreement in the concept’s direction and a shift in its place in defence thinking. Combined with political and operational demands, by the end of the research period structural limits emerged on the strategic effects that could be delivered in practice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAir poweren_US
dc.subjectStrategic air poweren_US
dc.subjectStrategic effecten_US
dc.subjectDesert Stormen_US
dc.subjectEffects-Based Operationsen_US
dc.subjectDoctrineen_US
dc.subjectUnited States Air Forceen_US
dc.subjectRoyal Air Forceen_US
dc.subjectRoyal Australian Air Forceen_US
dc.subjectIsraeli Air Forceen_US
dc.subjectRussian Aerospace Forcesen_US
dc.subjectArmée de l'Airen_US
dc.subject.lccUG630.W2
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Air Forceen
dc.subject.lcshGreat Britain. Royal Air Forceen
dc.subject.lcshAustralia. Royal Australian Air Forceen
dc.subject.lcshIsrael. Ḥel ăvıren
dc.subject.lcshRussia. Air Forceen
dc.subject.lcshFrance. Armée de l'airen
dc.subject.lcshAir poweren
dc.subject.lcshPersian Gulf War, 1991--Aerial operations, Americanen
dc.titleStrike, paralyse & control : the direction of modern strategic air power development & practice, 1989-2015en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/437


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International