Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorLang, Anthony F.
dc.contributor.advisorHayden, Patrick
dc.contributor.advisorKrystalli, Roxani
dc.contributor.authorHunfeld, Katharina Charlotte Martha
dc.coverage.spatial177en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-10T09:13:50Z
dc.date.available2023-04-10T09:13:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27366
dc.description.abstractGlobal justice continues to be one of the major fields of discussion in political philosophy, political theory, International Relations, and other subfields. While global justice is an academic area with an explicit global outlook, it is in no way a global debate: scholars at the centre of disciplinary theoretical debates do not hear or centre non-Western voices. Prevailing views about the ethics and politics of global justice reflect and continue to reinforce problematic ontological assumptions and unquestioned epistemic privileges aligned with knowledge- and norm-entrepreneurs in the Global North. This thesis advances two specific contributions to global normative thought. Firstly, I develop a decolonial critique of the mainstream global justice literature and contend that the virtually exclusive consideration of Western thought and the marginalisation of, for example, African thought in the global justice debate constitutes an instance of epistemic injustice. This thesis engages extensively with the notion of coloniality in order to understand and analyse the ways in which the global justice debate, as an academic discourse, implicitly reproduces those relations of power that emerged as a result of Empire, colonialism, and enslavement. Apart from foregrounding and problematising the pervasive, enduring epistemic traces of the colonial encounter in the debate on global justice, this thesis also makes a second, positive contribution, namely by engaging with African ubuntu thought as a constructive decolonial approach to global justice. Looking at the issues of epistemic injustice, global poverty, gender inequality, ecological justice, and the politics of time, I discuss the ways in which ubuntu is a particularly promising starting point for decentring and pluralising the dominant Western ontological framework underlying the debate. As a relational understanding of human existence, ubuntu calls attention to the importance of collective practices of care, community, and solidarity building, with significant potential for making visible and advancing decolonial efforts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectGlobal justiceen_US
dc.subjectColonialityen_US
dc.subjectEpistemic injusticeen_US
dc.subject.lccJC578.H8
dc.subject.lcshJusticeen
dc.subject.lcshSocial justiceen
dc.subject.lcshGlobalization--Moral and ethical aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshDecolonizationen
dc.subject.lcshUbuntu (Philosophy)en
dc.titleColoniality and the global justice debate : a decolonial approach to global normative theorisingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2027-10-23
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 23rd October 2027en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/388


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record