The path dependence of imperialism? Assessing the development impact of British informal empire on Egypt and Iraq : a comparative study
MetadataShow full item record
This project deploys path dependence theory to assess the extent to which duration of British ‘tutelage’ is sufficient in explaining the intensity of development impact on two states which formerly constituted large parts of Britain’s 20th century ‘informal empire’ in the Middle East: Egypt and Iraq. This project argues that the duration of ‘tutelage’ is insufficient in explaining depth of development impact and contends that what is theorised as the ‘depth’ of critical junctures represents the better indicator. The project nonetheless accepts the limitations of the theory and the risk of overemphasising the legacy of Empire in shaping the future of the Middle East, particularly in relation to Iraq and its borders. It does however present the case, in quasi-Foucauldian terms, that the realities matter less than the perception of Britain’s role in state-building, in understanding the political instability which has plagued the region.
Thesis, MPhil Master of Philosophy
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Embargo Date: 27-08-18
Embargo Reason: Thesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 18th August 2027
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.