Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorStabler, Jane
dc.contributor.authorPimentel, A. Rose
dc.coverage.spatial293en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-03T14:33:53Z
dc.date.available2012-05-03T14:33:53Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-14
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/2583
dc.description.abstractThis thesis argues that a ‘tradition of moral analysis’ between Jane Austen and George Eliot — a common ground which has been identified by critics from F.R. Leavis to Gillian Beer, but never fully explored — can be illuminated by turning to what this thesis calls ‘the reflective tradition’. In the eighteenth century, ideas about reflection provided a new and influential way of thinking about the human mind; about how we come to know ourselves and the world around us through the mind. The belief in the individual to act as his/her own guide through the cultivation of a reflective mind and attentiveness to a reflective voice emerges across a wide range of discourses. This thesis begins with an examination of reflection in the philosophy, children’s literature, novels, poetry, educational tracts and sermons that would have been known to Austen. It then defines Austen’s development of reflective dynamics by looking at her six major novels; finally, it analyzes Middlemarch to define Eliot’s proximity to this aspect of Austen’s art. The thesis documents Eliot’s reading of Austen through the criticism of G. H. Lewes to support a reading of Eliot’s assimilation of an Austenian attention to mental processes in her novels. Reflection is at the heart of moral life and growth for both novelists. This thesis corrects a tendency in Austen’s reception to focus on the mimetic aspect of her art, thereby overlooking the introspective sense of reflection. It offers new insights into Austen’s and Eliot’s work, and it contributes to an understanding of the development of the realist novel and the ethical dimension in the role of the novel reader.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectJane Austenen_US
dc.subjectGeorge Elioten_US
dc.subjectTraditionen_US
dc.subjectReflectionen_US
dc.subjectDevelopment realist novelen_US
dc.subjectEthical role readeren_US
dc.subject.lccPR4037.P56en_US
dc.subject.lcshAusten, Jane, 1775-1817--Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.lcshAusten, Jane, 1775-1817--Influenceen_US
dc.subject.lcshEliot, George, 1819-1880--Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subject.lcshEliot, George, 1819-1880. Middlemarchen_US
dc.subject.lcshIntrospection in literatureen_US
dc.subject.lcshIntrospectionen_US
dc.title'The divine voice within us' : the reflective tradition in the novels of Jane Austen and George Elioten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2025-03-01en_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonPrint and electronic copy restricted until 1st March 2025. Thesis restricted in accordance with University regulationsen_US


The following licence files are associated with this item:

  • Creative Commons

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported