Files in this item
Women's experiences of mammography : fresh insights and novel measures
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Ozakinci, Gozde | |
dc.contributor.author | Whelehan, Patsy | |
dc.coverage.spatial | xxiii, 263, LX p. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-13T05:37:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-13T05:37:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/25518 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Breast cancer is an important health problem with nearly 56,000 new invasive cases yearly in the UK. It is therefore the subject of a screening programme with mammography as the test. Screening programme effectiveness depends partly on acceptability of the test but mammography is not always acceptable to patients. This work aimed to improve upon current understandings of the impact of pain in mammography, and of the examination experience more broadly. Objectives: 1. To determine the relationship between mammography pain and repeat participation in breast screening; 2. To explore the contemporary experience of mammography in depth, from both patient and practitioner perspectives; 3. To develop and validate measures of patient experience in mammography. Methods: 1. A systematic review; 2. a qualitative interview study with Framework data management and thematic analysis; 3. an instrument development and measuring and modelling study incorporating the Rasch model. Findings: Painful mammography was the reason given by 11-46% of non-reattenders. Meta-analysis of a subset of studies showed a relative risk of non-reattendance after pain of 1.34 [95% CI 0.94-1.91]. Qualitative findings emphasised the importance of compassionate care and highlighted challenges practitioners face in providing it. Measures of adverse positioning and compassionate care in mammography were developed and validated, although further refinements are needed. Additional measures included general service quality and pain predisposition. In preliminary statistical analyses, mammography pain was associated with score on the pain predisposition measure. Compassionate care score was associated with general service quality score and showed some variation by mammographer. Conclusions/recommendations: Improved information and support interventions are required for women attending mammography for the first time and/or with high scores on the pain predisposition measure. An educational intervention to optimise compassionate care in mammography should be developed and tested, using a refined version of the compassionate care measure. The adverse positioning measure should be expanded and further validated. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | "This work was supported by: • The National Awareness and Early Detection Initiative (NAEDI), reference C29002/A12256. NAEDI was a consortium under the auspices of the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI). Partners were Cancer Research UK, Department of Health (England), Economic and Social Research Council, Health & Social Care R&D Division, Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), National Institute for Social Care and Health Research (Wales) and the Scottish Government. • The College of Radiographers Industry Partnership Scheme (CoRIPS), grant number 095 • The University of St Andrews School of Medicine Research Investment Fund • Charitable donations from fundraising by Mrs Fiona Edwards." -- Funding | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Mammography | en_US |
dc.subject | Breast cancer screening | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient experience | en_US |
dc.subject | Pain | en_US |
dc.subject | Rasch model | en_US |
dc.title | Women's experiences of mammography : fresh insights and novel measures | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | National Awareness and Early Detection Initiative (NAEDI) | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | College of Radiographers (Great Britain). Industry Partnership Scheme (CoRIPS) | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | University of St Andrews. School of Medicine. Research Investment Fund | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2027-04-20 | |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Thesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 20th April 2027 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/180 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | C29002/A12256 (NAEDI) | en_US |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 095 (CoRIPS) | en_US |
The following licence files are associated with this item:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.