Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorFawn, Rick
dc.contributor.authorHou, Pengfei
dc.coverage.spatialxvi, 200 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-17T08:31:03Z
dc.date.available2021-08-17T08:31:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/23784
dc.description.abstractThe thesis examines why and how the European Union (EU) engages with de facto states. Due to the state-centric framework’s structural impotence, de facto states cannot be appropriately understood, and hence tension continues. Although the statist order has been passively sustained, de facto states have not automatically disappeared. Worse, when the embodied conflicts cannot be held any longer or are accidentally triggered, accumulative resentment leads to military confrontations. Since the state-centric framework enshrining the exclusivity of nation-states is analytically parochial, the thesis takes a sociological turn by employing the anomie theory to understand the otherwise marginalised and biased de facto states. Developed by Émile Durkheim, the anomie theory focuses on collective consciousness and the ramifications resulting from its absence. Without conventional statehood, both the EU and de facto states are anomalies in the international arena. Nevertheless, whereas the EU, as a post-modern force, has been exceptionalised and accommodated, de facto states, as pre-modern social forces, should be, but have not been, eliminated. Given this, by taking de facto states as anomie resulting from the displaced collective consciousness, the thesis studies the EU engagement with them in and beyond the state-centric framework. To understand the EU’s engagement with de facto states and its engagement without recognition policy, the thesis analyses three case studies: Abkhazia, Somaliland and Taiwan from 1989 to 2019 via document analysis and expert/policy-maker interviews. As will be revealed in the thesis, the engagement policy cannot be fully comprehended by detaching it from the EU’s global ambition and policy innovations. In exercising influence in world politics, the EU follows the normative pathway by making its presence felt. Concerning the opportune dimensions of such engagement, it has not only catalysed the EU’s development of state-like power, but also signposted a possible scenario wherein the debilitating statist order can be transcended, albeit towards a yet-to-be-determined destination.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"My research would not have been possible without the CSC–St Andrews Joint Scholarship (No. 201708060001)." -- Acknowledgementsen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.relationData underpinning Pengfei Hou's thesis. Hou, P., University of St Andrews. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17630/c9381f3c-6c1b-42e7-8608-b4cdd0afef73en
dc.relationData underpinning Pengfei Hou's thesis (2) Hou, P., University of St Andrews. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17630/3d8df4fa-ca66-4dbf-bd72-b4e39e706c9ben
dc.relationData underpinning Pengfei Hou's thesis (3) Hou, P., University of St Andrews. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17630/4f2c7298-3ef3-4c54-b1f2-38e73f745871en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.17630/c9381f3c-6c1b-42e7-8608-b4cdd0afef73
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.17630/3d8df4fa-ca66-4dbf-bd72-b4e39e706c9b
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.17630/4f2c7298-3ef3-4c54-b1f2-38e73f745871
dc.subjectEUen_US
dc.subjectEU governanceen_US
dc.subjectExternal relationsen_US
dc.subjectDe facto statesen_US
dc.subjectAnomieen_US
dc.subjectConflicten_US
dc.subjectAbkhaziaen_US
dc.subjectSomalilanden_US
dc.subjectTaiwanen_US
dc.subject.lccJZ1570.A5H7
dc.subject.lcshEuropean Union--Foreign relationsen
dc.subject.lcshRecognition (International law)en
dc.subject.lcshAbkhazia (Georgia)--Foreign relations--European Union--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshSomaliland--Foreign relations--European Union--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshTaiwan--Foreign relations--European Union--Case studiesen
dc.titleOpportune conflicts : the EU's engagement with de facto statesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorChina Scholarship Council (CSC)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrewsen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2026-08-11
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 11th August 2026en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/122
dc.identifier.grantnumber201708060001en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record