Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorJones, Chris
dc.contributor.advisorJones, Tom
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Elizabeth Grace
dc.coverage.spatialiv, 231 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T12:54:57Z
dc.date.available2020-11-23T12:54:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21043
dc.description.abstractA full-length study of wolves in Old English literature has yet to be published. With the aim of filling this gap in research, this study provides an historicist examination of four pre-Norman texts (three Old English, one Anglo-Latin) in relation to two associations with wolves inherited from the classical and Germanic traditions: speech-stealing and outlawry. Though the Germanic association between wolves and outlaws has been the subject of much debate, there remains scope for extending previous analyses, particularly in relation to the Old English term wearg. Chapter one of this thesis therefore examines the legal, literary, and lexicological histories of this association. The classical speech-stealing lupus in fabula superstition, however, is markedly less well-researched. As such, the transmission of the superstition (which appears in a wide variety of classical and early medieval texts) is traced in chapter two, in which the likelihood that the lupus in fabula was known in pre-Norman England is also considered. Chapter three constitutes an analysis of the notoriously difficult Wulf and Eadwacer, wherein it is contended that the poem’s characters are simultaneously outlawed humans and wolves, based on the perceived lack of distinction between the two in Germanic literature and culture. Chapter four, meanwhile, is an analysis of Abbo of Fleury’s Anglo-Latin Passio sancti Eadmundi and Ælfric’s vernacular adaptation of the same text, arguing that the lupus in fabula superstition informed both works. The final chapter draws both lupine associations together, contending that the Grendelkin of Beowulf, as well as (to an extent) its titular hero, are wolf-like, speech-stealing outlaws who participate in a speech-stealing ‘feud’. This thesis thus endeavours to demonstrate that the wolf is not merely a Beast of Battle, but a creature who possessed a more complex and powerful hold upon the Anglo-Saxon imagination than has previously been recognised.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This work was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council [grant number 1947453], and the University of St Andrews (School of English)." -- Fundingen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectOld English literatureen_US
dc.subjectWolvesen_US
dc.subjectWolfen_US
dc.subjectAnimal studiesen_US
dc.subjectOld English languageen_US
dc.subjectAnglo-Saxon cultureen_US
dc.subjectAnglo-Latin literatureen_US
dc.subjectOutlawen_US
dc.subjectSuperstitionen_US
dc.subject.lccPR179.W64M2
dc.subject.lcshWolves in literatureen
dc.subject.lcshOutlaws in literatureen
dc.subject.lcshEnglish literature--Old English, ca. 450-1100--History and criticismen
dc.subject.lcshLatin literature, Medieval and modern--England--History and criticismen
dc.subject.lcshWolves--Folkloreen
dc.title‘The wolf in the story’ : wolves as speech-stealers and outlaws in Old English literatureen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorArts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Englishen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentSt Andrews Institute of Mediaeval Studiesen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2025-07-27
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 27th July 2025en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/10
dc.identifier.grantnumber1947453en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record