Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorMurer, Jeffrey Stevenson
dc.contributor.advisorBurt, Eleanor
dc.contributor.authorGordon-Gibson, Alasdair
dc.coverage.spatial287 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-25T15:34:36Z
dc.date.available2020-02-25T15:34:36Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19529
dc.description.abstractFailures of international humanitarian response to crisis are a prominent feature of contemporary debate, with most analysis focusing on the application of the core humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence, and the diminishing space in which these principles are able to function. This thesis argues that the space for humanitarian action has not diminished but a changed socio-political environment has meant that access to trusted representation in a space for discourse has altered. As an agent for re-direction the study examines whether the phenomenon of ‘voluntary service’ provides a more shared, less contested and more universally accepted identity for expression of the humanitarian purpose and its practices than the current discourse achieves. Through comparative analysis of humanitarian expressions across differing contexts of emergency response and drawing on research from relief agency archives as well as from personal experiences in these environments of complex emergency, the study explores opportunities that arise from understandings of a more dynamic space to house the humanitarian identities. It argues that by recognising and accepting its social and its political identity, humanitarian response can be auxiliary to authority in times of crisis as well as a place for constructive challenge. It is from within the interactions of this socio-political space and its iterations of communal needs that voluntary service draws its identity and its strength. The thesis focuses on considerations of how notions of ‘trust’ frame this community, and how variant understandings of good faith and intent influence the construction of a legitimate, protected space for independent voluntary action in complex emergencies. By considering the nature of the humanitarian relationship on the frontiers of politics and power, opportunities are located for a place in which a more inclusive, less contested discourse on the humanitarian identity might emerge.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectRed Cross principlesen_US
dc.subjectCrisis cooperationen_US
dc.subjectShared discourseen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational trusten_US
dc.subjectInstitutional efficiencyen_US
dc.subject.lccHV553.G77H8G20
dc.subject.lcshHumanitarianismen
dc.subject.lcshHumaniitarian assistanceen
dc.subject.lcshInternational reliefen
dc.subject.lcshRed Cross and Red Crescenten
dc.subject.lcshDisaster relief--Political aspectsen
dc.titleHumanitarians on the frontier : identity and access in the socio-political space of voluntary serviceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Managementen_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonEmbargo period has ended, thesis made available in accordance with University regulations.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-19529


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record