Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHarrison, David James
dc.contributor.authorBré, Jennifer
dc.coverage.spatial238 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-25T11:46:10Z
dc.date.available2019-10-25T11:46:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18773
dc.description.abstractAlthough most women with ovarian cancer initially respond to platinum-based therapy, overall survival is poor with only 45% of women alive 5 years after diagnosis. Gemcitabine, a fluoropyrimidine analogue often used when relapse occurs, shows limited additional survival benefit due to intrinsic and acquired resistance. Therefore, chemoresistance remains a burden for the treatment of these patients. Acelarin, a phosphoramidate modification of gemcitabine, is the first anti-cancer ProTide to enter the clinic and is currently in a Phase II trial for ovarian cancer. To date, it is showing clinically significant anti-tumour activity, even in patients who were not responsive to gemcitabine or relapsed. Understanding its mode of action may help to improve its efficacy and determine a biomarker for clinical response. A panel of ovarian cancer cell lines was used to compare the mode of action of Acelarin and gemcitabine. Combination of cisplatin and Acelarin was investigated in PE01 and PE04 cells, sensitive and resistant cell lines derived from a single patient who developed cisplatin resistance. DCK and DCTPP1 were previously identified as potential modulators of cancer cell sensitivity to Acelarin and could be used as predictive biomarkers. Acelarin and gemcitabine displayed differences in cytotoxicity, delays in cell cycles and DNA damage. PE01 and PE04 cells responded differently to combination, depending on the order of the sequence. The pyrimidine metabolism pathway, through the regulation of nucleotide pools, modulated sensitivity to Acelarin. However, there was no correlation between DCK and DCTPP1 and patients’ response from a Phase I cohort treated with Acelarin. Although similar in structure, Acelarin has a more targeted mechanism of action to induce cell death than gemcitabine. Repair mechanisms associated with platinumbased therapies resistance might potentiate Acelarin cytotoxicity. DCK and DCTPP1 are unlikely to either be of use as predictive biomarkers of clinical response to Acelarin.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.relationSarr, A., Bré, J., Um, I. H., Chan, T. H., Mullen, P., Harrison, D. J., & Reynolds, P. A. (2019). Genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 screen determines factors modulating sensitivity to ProTide NUC-1031. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 7643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44089-3
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44089-3
dc.subject.lccRM301.57B8
dc.titleExploration of the pharmacodynamic profile of Acelarin, a novel ProTide drug, in an in vitro model of ovarian canceren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorNHS Lothianen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorNuCana PLCen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonEmbargo period has ended, thesis made available in accordance with University regulationsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-18773


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record