Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHarrison, David James
dc.contributor.authorRead, Oliver James
dc.coverage.spatialvii, 204 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-16T15:47:50Z
dc.date.available2019-10-16T15:47:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/18692
dc.description.abstractTight control of post-translational modifications such as ubiquitination is important for cell homeostasis and dysregulation of this process is a common feature in many diseases. Itch encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase that conjugates ubiquitin to a variety of substrates such as Jun B, PKC-θ, PLC- γ1, LATS, TXNIP and p73. In this study both transient and stable knockdown techniques (siRNA and CRISPR respectively) were utilised to explore the role of Itch in both cancer progression and bone remodelling. Transient siRNA-mediated knockdown of Itch inhibited cell viability of MiaPaCa-2 and Capan-2 cell lines by ~50% and ~60% respectively compared to both scrambled and untreated controls as determined by SRB. Although siRNA did not increase cell line sensitivity to γ-radiation, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine, it did have an additive effect on resultant survivability. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated stable Itch knockdowns in the same cell lines in contrast showed increased sensitivity to the aforementioned treatment regimens however resultant data obtained from cell survival and clonogenicity assays suggested that the CRISPR⁺ MiaPaCa-2 cells divide faster than both scrambled and parental controls. SWATH-DIA analysis was performed to look for differences in proteome between CRISPR⁺ and parental MiaPaCa-2 cells. Preliminary data based on isogenic clones suggests potential differences, but additional repeats and further validation is required. Transient Itch knockdown in peripheral blood monocytes increased their capacity to differentiate into fully matured osteoclasts ex-vivo: compared to untreated controls, si-Itch treated wells showed higher mean numbers of large TRAP⁺ cells (mean = 63 and 54 for si-Itch and untreated wells respectively) and multinucleate cells (mean = 25 and 17 for si-Itch and untreated wells respectively) in a 96-well format. Meanwhile CRISPR-mediated knockdown induced a large degree of cellular toxicity in PBMCs. This contrast between stable and transient Itch knockdown prompted discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each technique and their suitability in different experimental contexts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectItchen_US
dc.subjectE3 ligaseen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectBone remodellingen_US
dc.subjectsiRNAen_US
dc.subjectCRISPRen_US
dc.titleExploring the role of Itch in human cancer and bone remodellingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2020-10-11
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Electronic copy restricted until 11th October 2020en


The following license files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's license for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International