Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorOtto, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorInnes, Bobby Richard
dc.coverage.spatial202, [10] p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T11:55:39Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T11:55:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-28
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/17968
dc.description.abstractAn overarching goal of multisensory research is to understand the rules by which multiple sensory signals are combined to produce behavioural benefits. One example of a multisensory benefit is that response times (RTs) to multisensory signals are faster than RTs to either component unisensory signal (the redundant signal effect). In contrast to other areas of multisensory research, a common explanatory model framework (and thus the basic combination rule) has yet to emerge for multisensory RT benefits. One key reason for this lack of progress would seem to be that additional processing interactions are infrequently quantified, and are rarely incorporated into a formal model of RTs. In this thesis, I assess the ability of a previously-neglected model class – so called race models – to account for both benefits and interactions. To do so, I develop and apply a comparative approach to RT analysis. This approach tests different experimental factors which attempt target sources of benefits and interactions. The effect of these manipulations is compared across 3 key analytical steps. First, the size of the multisensory benefit (i.e. the redundant signal effect) is computed, and compared to the basic prediction of the race model combination rule. Second, indicators of processing interactions beyond the basic combination rule are quantified. Third, a formal race model is applied to explain benefits and processing interactions. By consistently applying this comparative approach, I demonstrate that the race model framework offers a simple yet powerful account of multisensory benefits across participants. This suggests a basic combination rule for multisensory RT benefits. In addition, a new interpretation of interactions emerges by applying a race model framework, which highlights an important role of context. This approach suggests a common foundation for future studies of multisensory RTs, which can implement the same analytical steps within a wide range of experimental contexts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectReaction timesen_US
dc.subjectMultimodal integrationen_US
dc.subjectPerceptual decision-makingen_US
dc.subjectProbability summationen_US
dc.subjectRedundancy gainen_US
dc.subjectContext independenceen_US
dc.subjectLogic gatesen_US
dc.subjectSerial dependenceen_US
dc.subjectMiller's inequalityen_US
dc.subjectInteractive race modelen_US
dc.subjectCoactivation modelen_US
dc.titleTargeting benefits and interactions in multisensory processing : a novel modelling framework for exploring the redundant signal effecten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2020-06-03
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Electronic copy restricted until 3rd June 2020en


The following license files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's license for re-use is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International