Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHanley, Nick
dc.contributor.advisorLong, Jed
dc.contributor.advisorBorger, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorToledo Gallegos, Valeria Maria
dc.coverage.spatialxxii, 282 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T17:04:42Z
dc.date.available2019-03-04T17:04:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17208
dc.description.abstractGiven the general decline of estuarine ecosystem services (ES), policy makers require to understand further the drivers and barriers to increase society’s support for policies restoring them. The objective of this study is to identify significant sources of preference heterogeneity for improvements in flood control, recreation and biodiversity levels, resulting from tax-funded restoration projects that would be developed in the Clyde, Forth, and Tay catchment. We used data from a discrete choice experiment conducted in Scotland and applied several choice modelling techniques (e.g. MNL, RPL, HMXL, posterior analysis) to explore the effect of respondents socioeconomic characteristics, their latent attitudes and the local geographical context on their preferences towards policies managing estuarine ES. We found a positive and significant willingness to pay (WTP) for improving all ES, although differences in WTP estimates exist for all estuarine ES, across catchments and between user types. Recreation values were found to be lower on average than either flood control or biodiversity conservation, while preference differences emerge due to whether people live within a catchment and whether they visit it for recreational purposes or not. People visiting the areas for doing outdoor activities presented a higher latent environmental consciousness attitude. Moreover, environmentally conscious individuals showed stronger preferences for management alternatives delivering estuarine ES improvements. Finally, the presence of significant local clusters of WTP estimates suggests that respondents’ preferences interact with their immediate spatial context. Nonetheless, the local clusters of WTP for estuarine ES improvements are distributed similarly in space regardless of the ES in question, or the estuary under consideration. The research findings can be informative for designing more efficient and contextualised policies. Moreover, they can be helpful in raising the social acceptability of the policies aiming to manage estuarine ES in Scotland.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrewsen
dc.subjectDiscrete choice experimenten_US
dc.subjectWillingness to payen_US
dc.subjectEcosystem servicesen_US
dc.subjectEstuariesen_US
dc.subjectPreference heterogeneityen_US
dc.subjectHybrid choice modelen_US
dc.subjectHot spot analysisen_US
dc.subject.lccQH541.15E267T7
dc.subject.lcshPayments for ecosystem services--Scotlanden
dc.subject.lcshWillingness to pay--Scotlanden
dc.subject.lcshEstuaries--Management--Scotlanden
dc.titleInvestigating preference heterogeneity for restoring estuarine ecosystem servicesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography and Geosciencesen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-17208


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record