Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHarris, Julie
dc.contributor.authorCammack, Philip
dc.coverage.spatial227 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-04T15:31:54Z
dc.date.available2018-12-04T15:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/16624
dc.description.abstractDepth perception is a major component of 3D vision. There are many cues to depth; one particularly sensitive aspect is the vivid perception of depth created from having eyes with overlapping visual fields (binocular vision). As the eyes are located at different points in space, they see different views of the scene – these slight differences (called binocular disparity) can be used to obtain depth information. However, extracting depth from disparity requires complex visual processing. So why use binocular vision? Julesz (1971) proposed an explanation – camouflaged animals can fool the perception of some cues to 3D shape, but camouflage is ineffective against binocular vision. We would expect that animals with binocular vision could see the 3D shape of animals, despite their camouflage. Whilst commonly accepted, this hypothesis has not been tested in detail. In this thesis, we present experiments designed to establish how depth from binocular vision interacts with camouflage and object shape. Two main questions were addressed: First, we explored how the visual system represented depth information about 3D objects from binocular disparity. Objects with smooth depth edges (hill-shaped) were perceived with less depth than sharper edged objects. A computational model that segregated the object, then averaged the disparity over the segregated region emulated human performance. Finally, we found that disparity and luminance cues interacted to alter perceived depth. Secondly, we investigated if binocular vision could overcome camouflage. We found that camouflaged objects defined by luminance were detected faster when also defined by depth from disparity, thus reduces the effect of camouflage. Smooth objects were detected slower than sharp objects: an effect that was replicated in the real world, suggesting a camouflage technique to counter binocular vision. In summary, binocular vision is useful because it can detect camouflaged objects. However, smoother shapes take longer to spot, forming binocular (or stereoscopic) camouflage.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccBF469.C26
dc.subject.lcshDepth perceptionen
dc.subject.lcshMovement, Psychology ofen
dc.subject.lcshCamouflage (Biology)en
dc.titleExploring how object shape and binocular vision interact to make or break camouflageen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrewsen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology & Neuroscienceen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record