Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorBlumenau, Bernhard
dc.contributor.advisorRamsay, Gilbert Aubrey Warner
dc.contributor.authorVeilleux-Lepage, Yannick
dc.coverage.spatial415 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-23T11:11:57Z
dc.date.available2018-07-23T11:11:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/15643
dc.description.abstractTerrorism research often tends to anachronistically impose current conceptions of terrorism onto historical events, comparing and equating modern terrorism to selected historical incidents, thus decontextualizing them and ignoring that these historical acts had different aims, used different tactics, and were interpreted in different ways at the times in which they took place. This thesis proposes a new framework which not only reconceptualises terrorism, but also provides a sound means by which the evolution and spread of techniques associated with terrorism can be surveyed. To this end, this thesis argues that terrorism should be viewed as an umbrella term for a wide range of techniques viewed (by the societies in which they are enacted) as illegitimate means of collective actions aimed at making political claims and seeking to influences political processes and outcomes. The proposed framework – based on an evolutionary approach – advances three arguments: (1) techniques of political violence have variation in fixed traits and behavioural patterns; (2) these traits and patterns can be transferred either through reproduction or emulation; and (3) the relative rate of transmission is partially determined by a trait’s usefulness in adapting to the technique’s ever-changing environment. This evolutionary approach allows us to conceptualise different techniques of political violence as variants among many, all of which have undergone a range of mutations, thereby allowing us to trace each technique’s development by looking at its predecessors. This framework is in turn applied to a survey of the evolution of aeroplane hijacking – with a specific focus on the various adaptations the technique has undergone since its inception, the means by which such variations spread, and the factors leading to its adoption or rejection by different claim makers operating in different environment and seeking to advance diverse claims – and concluding that modern examples of hijacking are nothing more than one mutation along a long evolutionary path which began in the jungles of Peru nearly 85 years ago.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccHV6431.V45
dc.subject.lcshTerrorism--Historyen
dc.subject.lcshTerrorism--Historyen
dc.subject.lcshTerrorism--Study and teachingen
dc.subject.lcshHijacking of aircraften
dc.subject.lcshTerroristsen
dc.titleHow terror evolves : an evolutionary framework for the study of terroristic techniquesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorCanadian Centennial Scholarship Fund (CCSF)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScotland's Saltire Scholarships (SSS)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorCanada. Social Science and Humanities Research Councilen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorHanda Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record