Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorRoscoe, Philip
dc.contributor.advisorVlcek, William
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Lori Leigh
dc.coverage.spatialxx, 439 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T13:03:52Z
dc.date.available2018-06-19T13:03:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/14255
dc.description.abstractEstablished in 2003, the Kimberley Process (KP) is a binding agreement; backed by the United Nations, that unites civil societies, state actors and the diamond industry to safeguard ‘conflict’ diamonds from entering legitimate rough diamond trade around the world. The unique international tripartite organization is voluntary but mandates state participants to abide by the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) minimum requirements in order to stem the financing or wars against legitimate governments. This study represents the first to explore the communications within the KP. The linguistic turn relies on Classical rhetoric theory with an emphasis on Aristotle’s three appeals of persuasion (“pisteis”): ethos, logos and pathos of elite actors in the KP. As for the precise nature of the contribution to rhetorical analysis, this project is best characterised as an application of Classical principals of rhetorical analysis, rather than as a development of theory. A comprehensive literature review of the KP and KPCS is another distinctive contribution. Furthermore, this academic endeavour offers a unique method as shown in the observation of a KP Intersessional meeting. Supplementing the qualitative inquiry, semi-structured interviews were conducted with all of the KP groups and included a wide sample of civil society international and national non-government organizations, state actors and industry members otherwise not represented in previous empirical efforts on the subject. The data chapters achieve the primary aim to add to the understanding of the KP. Firstly, the civil societies engage in boycott rhetoric using ethos and negative pathos. As for state actors, the KP Chair exhibits charismatic leadership rhetoric, while ‘recognized’ established states use logical reasoning, the ‘outlier’ states evoke positive pathos. Lastly, the diamond industry experts appeal to negative emotions, the World Diamond Council to logos, and De Beers to positive emotional appeals. Combined, the rhetoric shows (a) how KP rhētors use different rhetorical strategies; (b) which in turn shape distinct discourses; (c) and contain dissimilar claims; (d) points to different motivations; (e) highlight different identities; (f) reveal key characteristics, and; (g) the nature of relationships within the KP. The organization rhetorical analysis also entails how the multiple KP leaders view the KP and KPCS and change. While the rhetoric helps demonstrate the constraints surrounding the KP and KPCS it also underlines the primary human rights and human security in which they all share. This thesis provides an extended critical view of the rhetoric by connecting Aristotelian pisteis with different conceptions of power outlined by French and Raven (1959) and Lukes (2005/1974). Combined, the rhetoric helps to explain the ways the KP attempts to achieve their specific political and economic goals while also building relationships with their stakeholders. Rhetoric is a worthwhile theory and methodological approach in order to explore organizations. The KP, and other international organizations provide an opportune arena for further rhetorical attention.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectThe Kimberley Process/Kimberley Process Certificateen_US
dc.subjectConflict diamonds/blood diamondsen_US
dc.subjectAristotle rhetorical anaylsisen_US
dc.subjectEthos/logos/pathosen_US
dc.subjectInternational tripartite regimeen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational rhetoricen_US
dc.subjectSteven Lukes Poweren_US
dc.subjectThe diamond industryen_US
dc.subject.lccHD9677.A2D2
dc.subject.lcshDiamond industry and tradeen
dc.subject.lcshConflict diamondsen
dc.subject.lcshRhetorical criticismen
dc.subject.lcshRhetoric--Political aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Nationsen
dc.subject.lcshInternational cooperationen
dc.titleThe Kimberley Process and Certificate Scheme : a classical Aristotelian rhetorical analysis of the international tripartite regime against conflict diamondsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of International Relationsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2023-05-22
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 22nd May 2023en


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International