St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Medicine (School of)
  • Medicine
  • Medicine Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Medicine (School of)
  • Medicine
  • Medicine Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Medicine (School of)
  • Medicine
  • Medicine Theses
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Psychological factors predicting health behaviour : the response to risk factor screening for cardiovascular disease

Thumbnail
View/Open
WendyMSimpsonPhDThesis.pdf (50.62Mb)
Date
07/1996
Author
Simpson, Wendy M.
Funder
SHARP Committee
Great Britain. Scottish Home and Health Department
Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland
Fife Educational Trust
Sir Richard Stapley Educational Trust
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Abstract
The two main aims of this thesis were first, to predict health behaviour and, second, to apply and test the existing psychological theories in this field. The health behaviours concerned were the responses to screening for risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Three empirical studies were carried out. The first response to screening is whether one attends or not. Results showed that uptake of screening in worksite settings (N=425) (Chapter 2) could be predicted by the health beliefs derived from social cognition models. Intention to attend was the best predictor of attendance. However, differences in predictive beliefs between worksites suggested communication factors were also an issue. Subsequently, communication factors were investigated in a study of uptake in general practice (N=210) (Chapter 4) finding that the method of offering screening affected uptake significantly. The second response to screening is the impact it has on the screenee. Results found that communication factors had little effect on screening impact in that there was little difference between three methods of offering screening in terms of their subsequent impact on patients' satisfaction, knowledge, intention or behaviour change (Chapter 4). Social cognitions, however, were found to predict impact in terms of behaviour change with a sample of attenders (N=59) at a screening clinic in general practice (Chapter 3). In the latter study, perceived threat was the best predictor of behaviour change. Four social cognition models were compared against each other in the classification of attenders and non-attenders in the Worksite study (Chapter 2). Apart from Social Learning Theory the other models performed adequately, but the Theory of Reasoned Action was the most successful. More recent theories were examined in the prediction of behaviour change following screening (Chapter 3). The data supported the stage model, the Precaution Adoption Process. The internal structure of the Health Action Process Approach was questioned, but the addition of an 'action phase' in tills model showed promise.
Type
Thesis, PhD Doctor of Philosophy
Collections
  • Medicine Theses
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13356

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter