Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorReid, Louise Anne
dc.contributor.advisorClayton, Daniel Wright
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Thomas S. J.
dc.coverage.spatialiv, 335 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-28T10:00:49Z
dc.date.available2018-02-28T10:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/12815
dc.description.abstractRecent years have seen the emergence of a novel type of community space around the world, labelled variously as makerspaces, hackerspaces, hacklabs, Fab Labs, and repair cafés. These workshops, often known collectively as the ‘maker movement’, have inspired considerable speculation regarding their potential to prefigure a more sustainable economy, including a shift to localised and participatory forms of production and consumption (Smith and Light, 2017). Until recently, the social scientific work on such spaces has been sparse, especially in-depth ethnographic work, though scholars are increasingly turning their attention to them, particularly in the fields of design and science and technology studies. This thesis, a practice-led ‘enactive ethnography’ drawing from three case study workshops in Edinburgh, Scotland, explores the question of sustainable development and maker spaces along two main axes: firstly, the emergence of sustainable practice in such spaces, and secondly, the relevance of such spaces to the cultivation of human wellbeing. The thesis is the first examination of such spaces drawing from developments in social theory towards relational materialism, more-than-representational approaches, and a focus on social practice. It draws a number of conclusions. Firstly, that claims of an undifferentiated global ‘maker movement’ may be exaggerated: the grassroots participant-led creation of such spaces results in irreducible diversity and local differentiation. Secondly, while claims about the potential of such spaces for reconfiguring global production and consumption are overstated, when viewed from a practice-oriented perspective, the communities of practice populating such sites comprise potent and potentially-valuable crucibles of knowledge and materials. And thirdly, trying to move away from individualistic conceptions of wellbeing, the case studies provided evidence for the shared workshops playing a crucial role in the contingent emergence of participant wellbeing. These findings are further developed in tandem with a posthuman reading of maker practices, contributing to timely scholarly debates on ‘making’ and ‘craft’.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrewsen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectHuman geographyen_US
dc.subjectCraften_US
dc.subjectCommunity economiesen_US
dc.subjectPractice theoryen_US
dc.subject.lccN6498.H36S6
dc.subject.lcshHandicraft in arten
dc.subject.lcshHandicraft--Scotland
dc.subject.lcshSustainable living
dc.titleMaterial geographies of the maker movement : community workshops and the making of sustainability in Edinburgh, Scotlanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. 7th century Scholarshipen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


The following license files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's license for re-use is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International