Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorTate, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorGarrard, Suz
dc.coverage.spatialv, 254 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T15:57:35Z
dc.date.available2017-08-31T15:57:35Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-18
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/11578
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is a transatlantic examination of self-representational strategies in factory women’s poetry from circa 1848-1882, highlighting in particular how the medium of the working-class periodical enabled these socially marginal poets to subjectively engage with and reconfigure dominant typologies of class and gender within nineteenth-century poetics. The first chapter explores how working-class women were depicted in middle-class social-reform literature and working-class men’s poetry. It argues that factory women were circumscribed into roles of social villainy or victimage in popular bourgeois reform texts by authors such as Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Caroline Norton, and were cast as idealized domestic figures in working-class men’s poetry in the mid-nineteenth century. The remaining three chapters examine the poetry of Manchester dye-worker Fanny Forrester, Scottish weaver Ellen Johnston, and Lowell mill-girl Lucy Larcom as case-studies of factory women’s poetics in mid-nineteenth century writing. Chapter Two discusses the life and work of Fanny Forrester in Ben Brierley’s Journal, and considers how Forrester’s invocation of the pastoral genre opens new opportunities for urban, factory women to engage with ideologies of domestic femininity within a destabilized urban cityscape. Chapter Three considers the work of Ellen Johnston, “The Factory Girl” whose numerous poems in The People’s Journal and the Penny Post cross genres, dialects, and themes. This chapter claims that Johnston’s poetry divides class and gender identity depending on her intended audience—a division exemplified, respectively, by her nationalistic poetry and her sentimental correspondence poetry. Chapter Four explores the work of Lucy Larcom, whose contributions to The Lowell Offering and her novel-poem An Idyl of Work harness the language and philosophy of Evangelical Christianity to validate women’s wage-labor as socially and religiously appropriate. Ultimately, this thesis contends that nineteenth-century factory women’s poetry from Britain and America embodies the tensions surrounding the “factory girl” identity, and offers unique aesthetic and representational strategies of negotiating women’s factory labor.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectVictorian poetryen_US
dc.subjectWorking-class poetryen_US
dc.subjectNineteenth-century literatureen_US
dc.subjectPeriodical studiesen_US
dc.subjectNineteenth-century newspapersen_US
dc.subjectNew formalismen_US
dc.subjectScottish Jute industryen_US
dc.subjectGaribaldi in Britainen_US
dc.subjectPastoral poetryen_US
dc.subjectNewspaper poetryen_US
dc.subjectLowell Millen_US
dc.subjectLucy Larcomen_US
dc.subjectTransatlanticismen_US
dc.subjectElizabeth Barrett Browningen_US
dc.subject.lccPR595.W6G2
dc.subject.lcshWorking class writings, English
dc.subject.lcshWorking class writings, Scottish
dc.subject.lcshWorking class writings, American
dc.subject.lcshEnglish poetry--Women authors--19th century
dc.subject.lcshAmerican poetry--Women authors--19th century
dc.subject.lcshForrester, Fanny, 1852-1889--Criticism and interpretationen
dc.subject.lcshJohnston, Ellen, 1835-1873--Criticism and interpretationen
dc.subject.lcshLarcom, Lucy, 1824-1893--Criticism and interpretationen
dc.titleManufacturing selves : the poetics of self-representation and identity in the poetry of three “factory-girls”, 1840-1882en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorClan Donal Educational and Charitable Trusten_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2019-08-15
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 15th August 2022en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record