Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorLehr, Peter
dc.contributor.advisorMcConaghy, Kieran
dc.contributor.advisorMarsden, Sarah V.
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Roger Patrick
dc.coverage.spatialx, 295 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-30T13:55:37Z
dc.date.available2017-08-30T13:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/11567
dc.description.abstractThis thesis challenges the conventional wisdom that tends to conflate Arab foreign fighters with Islamist terrorists, and ‘martyrdom operations’ with ‘suicide attacks.’ Overlaps notwithstanding, it aims to draw distinctions between Arab foreign fighters engaged in defensive jihad defending co-religionists against a military foe, and Islamist terrorists engaged in terrorism that indiscriminately targets civilians and non-combatants. Critically, while disaggregating the two transnational cohorts, this thesis also illuminates the nexus between them. It draws on a thesis dataset of 3,010 Arab foreign fighters compiled using biographies, martyrdom eulogies, and postings on ‘jihadi’ websites, in both English and Arabic. This dataset is then used to support three case studies involving the defensive jihads in 1980s Afghanistan, Iraq (post 2003), and Syria (post 2011). It leverages a theoretical framework based on the concept of radicalisation and the language of political Islam, whilst concurrently drawing on theories from psychology and historical military examples of combat, germane to defensive jihad and Islamist terrorism. The thesis concludes that Arab foreign fighters involved in defensive jihad employ martyrdom operations against military targets, through tactical necessity. Conversely, Islamist terrorists employ suicide attacks against civilians and non-combatants, through ideological necessity. The trajectory between the two transnational mobilisations appears to be broadly underpinned by facets of the Lucifer Effect – the situational factors encountered whilst participating in defensive jihad, including but not limited to, the experience of close combat in a war zone; being subjected to ideological indoctrination; and being exposed to charismatic authority and obedience to it. This suggests that subsequent involvement in Islamist terrorism by some Arab foreign fighters is primarily forged in the crucible of defensive jihad. Such findings should result in the crafting of more individualised de-radicalisation and rehabilitation programmes for returning foreign fighters, in both the West and the Arab world.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectArab foreign fightersen_US
dc.subjectRadicalisationen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Islamen_US
dc.subjectLucifer Effecten_US
dc.subjectDefensive jihaden_US
dc.subjectCharismatic authority and obedienceen_US
dc.subjectIdeological indoctrinationen_US
dc.subject.lccBP182.W2
dc.subject.lcshJihad
dc.subject.lcshTerrorism--Religious aspects--Islam
dc.titleForged in the crucible of defensive jihad : Arab foreign fighters and their trajectory to involvement in Islamist terrorismen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentThe Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV)en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record