Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHealy, Sue
dc.contributor.advisorTempleton, Christopher N.
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, Nora
dc.coverage.spatial[10], 192 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-03T14:15:47Z
dc.date.available2017-08-03T14:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/11366
dc.description.abstractTo combat the ever-present threat of predation many species produce anti-predator vocalizations and behaviours (mobbing) designed to drive predators away. These vocalizations can encode a predator’s threat level, and many species within a community will eavesdrop on this information. To determine how prey species produce, use, and respond to anti-predator information and how individual, social, and phylogenetic factors of different species may influence this behaviour, I conducted a series of robotic-predator presentation and anti-predator vocalization playback experiments in the wild and lab. I predicted that UK Paridae would encode information the same as previously studied species. I found that UK Paridae encode predator information in different ways, and that neither phylogeny nor ecology explained the patterns of similarity in how different species encode predator threat in their calls. Flock structure appeared to affect how species encoded predator threat and while multiple species may be sources of information for familiar flock mates, only blue and great tits met the criteria to be community informants. As blue and great tits need prior experience to recognize novel predators and juvenile great tits avoid novel predators only after seeing adults mob them, tits may use mobbing calls to learn about novel predators. While they responded to mobbing calls, juvenile blue and great tits did not engage in mobbing behaviour although they appear capable of doing so. Furthermore, while individuals varied in their responses to aerial alarm calls this variation was not explained by either their proximity to the call nor their personality. In this close examination of how anti-predator vocalizations are produced and used by UK Paridae, I found variation in these signals. This challenges previous assumptions about how Paridae encode information, raising questions as to the sources of this variation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectMobbingen
dc.subjectPredator-prey dynamicsen
dc.subjectAcoustic communicationen
dc.subjectAntipredator behaviouren
dc.subjectInformation encodingen
dc.subjectParidaeen
dc.subjectPredator recognitionen
dc.subjectAerial alarm callsen
dc.subjectLearningen
dc.subject.lccQL696.P2615C2
dc.subject.lcshPredation (Biology)
dc.subject.lcshTitmice--Behaviour
dc.titleAnti-predator behaviour in UK tit species : information encoding, predator recognition, and individual variationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. 600th Anniversary Scholarshipen
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. St Leonard's College Scholarshipen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2021-03-07
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 7th March 2021en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record