Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorTausch, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorAyanian, Arin H.
dc.coverage.spatialxiii, 269 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T10:35:55Z
dc.date.available2017-02-22T10:35:55Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-20
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/10332
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present research is to advance a general predictive model of the social psychological processes underlying collective action in contexts where collective action is met with significant repression by the authorities. The model integrates the recent advancements in the collective action literature and examines the unique predictive role of anger and fear (emotional pathway), political, identity consolidation and participative efficacies (instrumental pathway), politicised identification (identity pathway) as well as moral obligation, over and above past participation. Moreover, the research investigates how perceived risk, due to government sanctions, shapes these antecedents and the willingness to engage in collective action. Five survey studies (Studies 1 to 5) test this model in various repressive contexts (i.e., Egypt, Hong Kong, Russia, Ukraine, and Turkey). In addition, one experimental study (Study 6) examines the causal relation between perceived risk and (a) the antecedents of collective action and (b) the action intentions in a British sample. The results confirm the intensifying role of perceived risk, whereby it indirectly spurs further resistance through shaping the antecedents of collective action. The results also suggest that protesters are intrinsically motivated to engage in collective action when placed under risk. Specifically, although not motivated by political efficacy, protesters are strategic as they are motivated by the likelihood to consolidate the identity of their protest movement and the likelihood of their own participation to incrementally contribute to achieving the desired goals. Moreover, they are emotional, politicised and dutiful as their outrage towards how the authorities treat the protesters, their identification with their protest movement, as well as their sense of moral responsibility encourage them to take action despite the risks.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.relationAyanian, A.H., & Tausch, N. (2016). How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 700-721. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12084en_US
dc.subjectCollective actionen_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectIdentityen_US
dc.subjectMoral obligationen_US
dc.subjectEmotionsen_US
dc.subjectEfficacy beliefsen_US
dc.subject.lccHM1101.A8
dc.subject.lcshRisk perceptionen
dc.subject.lcshRisk--Sociological aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshSocial action--Psychological aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshIdentity (Psychology)en
dc.subject.lcshGroup identityen
dc.titleUnderstanding collective action in repressive contexts : the role of perceived risk in shaping collective action intentionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorInternational Center on Nonviolent Conflicten_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonEmbargo period has ended, thesis made available in accordance with University regulations.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-10332


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record