Show simple item record

Files in this item

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorReicher, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorRath, Rakshi
dc.coverage.spatial238en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-28T17:02:31Z
dc.date.available2016-11-28T17:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/9892
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the thesis is to provide a social identity account of the politics of mobilisation: based on hatred mostly, in contrast with accounts of solidarity. The bulk of the thesis concentrates on exploring how and why is prejudice in the form of hatred mobilised in inter-group relations. Three studies parse the structure of hate discourse of Hindu right-wing groups in India. Study 1 and study 2 are qualitative studies that analyse the production of hate in two mediums of communication, while study 3 is an experimental study demonstrating the reception of hate. The studies analyse the structure of hate discourse with the theoretical lens of a social identity framework to explicate a context of categories and category-relations, while colouring in the contents of the categories with data from India. The first contention is, if a virtuous in-group can be construed as under threat from an out-group, then, the annihilation of the other can be justified as the defence of virtue. In the other words, violence becomes virtuous. The second contention is, the process that motivates out-group hate discourse derives from struggles over intra-group authority. That is, out-group threats are invoked in order to condemn political rivals for in-group power as not representing the group and not defending group interests. This sets up the foil for the leader to position ‘self’ as the ideal leader who protects and represents the in-group, while undermining the credibility of the political rival. Study 4 is a qualitative study analysing counter-hegemonic discourse on mobilisations against the rhetoric of hatred. Taken together, the first 3 studies argue that hatred is not an inherent feature of individuals or a natural fall-out of inter-group processes, it is mobilised for specific political aims. The fourth study looks at the dimensions with which other leaders counteract the politics of hate; when hatred can be mobilised, so can solidarity. The theoretical implications and limitations have been discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectSocial psychologyen_US
dc.subjectViolenceen_US
dc.subjectInter-group relationsen_US
dc.subjectIntra-group relationsen_US
dc.subjectLeadershipen_US
dc.subjectHate rhetoricen_US
dc.subjectSolidarity discourseen_US
dc.subjectMobilisationen_US
dc.subjectPoliticsen_US
dc.subjectPrejudiceen_US
dc.subjectSocial identity theoryen_US
dc.subjectSelf categorisation theoryen_US
dc.subject.lccHM753.R28
dc.subject.lcshGroup identityen
dc.subject.lcshPrejudicesen
dc.subject.lcshHateen
dc.subject.lcshRace relations--Indiaen
dc.subject.lcshHate speech--Indiaen
dc.subject.lcshSocial groups--Indiaen
dc.titleVirtuous violence : a social identity approach to understanding the politics of prejudice in inter-group relationsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology & Neuroscienceen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record