Files in this item
Knight or Wight in Keats's 'La Bella Dame'?: An Ancient Ditty Reconsidered
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Jones, Chris | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 39-49 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-04-08T10:31:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-04-08T10:31:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Jones, C. (2005). 'Knight or Wight in Keats's 'La Bella Dame'?: An Ancient Ditty Reconsidered.' Keats-Shelley Review 19: 39-49 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-4142 | en |
dc.identifier.other | StAndrews.ResExp.Output.OutputID.10276 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/645 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article re-examines the various processes of textual transmission for Keats's 'La Belle Dame sans Merci', which have resulted in two 'competing' texts of the poem. It argues that a medieval model of textual production offers a strategy for dealing with this circumstance, and that, approached in this way, there is no need to resolve the textual 'problem' that the poem poses. | en |
dc.format.extent | 52920 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 2541 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Keats | en |
dc.subject | La Belle Dame sans Merci | en |
dc.subject | poem poetry | en |
dc.subject | text | en |
dc.subject | textual | en |
dc.subject | version | en |
dc.subject | medieval | en |
dc.subject | medieaval | en |
dc.subject | medievalist | en |
dc.subject | mediaevalist | en |
dc.subject | knight | en |
dc.subject | wight | en |
dc.title | Knight or Wight in Keats's 'La Bella Dame'?: An Ancient Ditty Reconsidered | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.audience.mediator | School : English | en |
dc.description.version | https://doi.org/Postprint | en |
dc.publicationstatus | Published | en |
dc.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.