St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Classics (School of)
  • Classics
  • Classics Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Classics (School of)
  • Classics
  • Classics Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Classics (School of)
  • Classics
  • Classics Theses
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Visuality, art and ecphrasis in the Monobiblos of Propertius

Thumbnail
View/Open
RodFreemanPhDThesis.pdf (2.415Mb)
Date
2013
Author
Freeman, Rod
Supervisor
Rees, Roger
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Abstract
In this thesis I argue that the conflation of puella, art and godhead in Propertius 2.31 and the succeeding 2.32 strongly impacts upon the opening book, the Monobiblos, of the same author. The dynamic of vision, the poet’s pictorial imagination, and the feminised, subservient stance of the elegiac lover are all well documented strains of Propertian elegy, but have generally been treated as independent areas of study. By emphasising vision as the key factor that inextricably binds lover and beloved, confusing their roles within the text, I argue that the poems of the Monobiblos respond both to contemporary effects in visual art within the changing fashions in wall painting, and a literary tradition of visuality. In the second half of this thesis I show how Propertius draws on stylistic effects in late Second and early Third Style wall painting and so provides a poetic response to viewing contemporary art. Yet not only does his poetry, like wall painting, aim to involve the reader visually but also requires the reader’s participation in the dynamic verbal artefact he creates. Just as the emerging imperial ideology was being increasingly impressed upon the Roman citizenry through the power of imagery, so this text creates a multifaceted narrative that enables a constantly shifting accessibility of viewpoint across traditional gender lines. As a consequence, the imbrication of erotic and poetic concerns highlights the tension between art and literature in this text.
Type
Thesis, PhD Doctor of Philosophy
Collections
  • Classics Theses
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3738

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter