Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorPalmer, James Trevor
dc.contributor.authorEdholm, Matthew Brian
dc.coverage.spatial302en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-12T10:26:24Z
dc.date.available2025-02-12T10:26:24Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/31369
dc.description.abstractThis thesis studies the inheritance of classical literature at the monastery of Fulda in the ninth century. An examination of two writers, Rudolf of Fulda and Brun Candidus, provides a kind of case study of the broader intellectual networks and transmission of classical literature at work in the Carolingian Empire. The study attempts to situate Carolingian literary aesthetics within the context of Late Antique poetry and material culture. It argues that the dominant thread in these writers was the inheriting and refashioning of past classical sources. Through slight emendations made to the classical sources, Rudolf and Candidus are able to incorporate and synthesize pagan writers into the Christian culture of the ninth century. The thesis uses the transmission history of Vitruvius’ De architectura as a case study of the broader intellectual networks. Further, it uncovers a previously unknown Carolingian reader of Vitruvius, Rudolf, and argues for the onetime existence of a manuscript copy of Vitruvius at the Fulda monastery. Additionally, the thesis contains the first English translations of Rudolf’s Miracula sanctorum in Fuldenses ecclesias translatorum, and Brun Candidus’ opus geminatum or ‘twinned-work’, the prose Vita Eigilis, and the metrical Vita Aeigili. In the study of the metrical Vita the thesis argues that, contrary to being simply derivative or unoriginal, through the use and manipulation of fragments of classical poets such as Vergil and Ovid, Candidus created a narrative subtext to his poem that offered a commentary on the recent crisis at the Fulda monastery, while also offering a vision of ideal and harmonious monastic life. An extensive commentary on the poem adds to this evidence by examining in detail every classical reference in the poem.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMonasticismen_US
dc.subjectCarolingianen_US
dc.subjectHrabanus Maurusen_US
dc.subjectRudolf of Fuldaen_US
dc.subjectBrun Candidusen_US
dc.titleIntellectual exchange and the reception of classical literature at early medieval Fuldaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUnited States. Department of Veterans Affairsen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2030-02-06
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 06 February 2030en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/1224


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record