Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorBlakeway, Amy
dc.contributor.advisorDel Campo, Ana
dc.contributor.advisorCarpenter, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorSecmezsoy-Urquhart, Jessica Yasemin Elizabeth
dc.coverage.spatial339en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T13:08:20Z
dc.date.available2024-09-20T13:08:20Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/30570
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the importance of neurodiverse court fools and bodilydiverse court dwarfs and giant porters at the English, Scottish and British royal courts and in society between 1485-1649 using a comparative approach and joint Disability History and Court History lenses. It does so to demonstrate that these groups, due to widely accepted desired differentness, gained roles at these courts as ‘disabled courtiers’, figures who this work defines as non-servants usually tied to the domus magnificencie who were unique in their positions and treatment due to disabilities yet are only fully understandable through their court context as members of the royal household and court. A disabled group whose sources are extant due to proximity to royalty, they provide proof of the specific and positive views and treatment of disabled people in Britain before the rise of modern ableism. To do this, chapter one considers the wider perception of natural fools and wonders outside royal courts which was informed by contemporary religion and law which tried to tackle the incapacity of the natural fool to participate in everyday life yet emphasised the special nature of disabled people and their right to support. This alongside belief in a desired differentness inherent to fools and wonders created by favourable religious and cultural depictions led to these groups finding membership in the royal household as chapter two investigates. They enjoyed renumeration akin to other household members and as the period went on had a rise in status. Chapter three focuses on the specific ‘Court’ element of their roles which situates them in their court space and community while chapter four shows the groups’ importance to royal display and construction of royal virtues. By the thesis’s conclusion the significance of ‘Disabled Courtier’ roles for Tudor England, Stewart Scotland and Stuart Britain will be demonstrated.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectHistoryen_US
dc.subjectScottish historyen_US
dc.subjectDisabilityen_US
dc.subjectEnglish historyen_US
dc.subjectTudorsen_US
dc.subjectStuartsen_US
dc.subjectCourt historyen_US
dc.subjectDisability historyen_US
dc.subjectFoolsen_US
dc.subjectWondersen_US
dc.subjectRenaissanceen_US
dc.subjectEarly modernen_US
dc.titleThe book of the disabled courtier : neurodiverse court fools and bodilydiverse court wonders at the English Tudor, Scottish Stewart and British Stuart royal courts 1485-1649en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorArts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2026-09-19
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 19 Sep 2026en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/1104


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International