Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorCox, Rory
dc.contributor.advisorFirnhaber-Baker, Justine
dc.contributor.authorHu, Jiazhu
dc.coverage.spatial176en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-12T14:31:01Z
dc.date.available2024-01-12T14:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29002
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the political communication between royal and local governments in late medieval England. It focuses on the petitionary language used by medieval English maritime towns, especially by the confederation of the Cinque Ports, under the reigns of Edward I, II and III, in order to examine the political awareness and self-representation of medieval England's urban-maritime communities. It intends to contribute to an ongoing historiographical movement that redresses the isolationist view of urban presence in the medieval English polity, and also to a broader understanding of what the perspective of political language might bring to the studies of medieval England's political culture. Chapter I discusses how the focus and methods of this research have been influenced by a few currents underlying the historiography of late medieval England's politics and political culture. It also introduces the methodological framework of this thesis, and presents the arrangement of the other three chapters. Chapter II focuses on the usage of the unique title of 'barons' in the petitions from the Cinque Ports, in order to reveal the self-representation of the Portsmen through petitioning. Owing to the limits of constitutional documentation regarding the origin and nature of this collective urban baronship, this chapter suggests taking a more communicative approach to understand the rhetorical use of this title. Chapter III provides a case study on the Portsmen's sophisticated petitionary strategy, to examine their use of political language during their communication with the English Crown in the early fourteenth century. Through a comparison with Great Yarmouth's performance, this chapter aims to demonstrate the political awareness of the Portsmen, which included their alertness to current political circumstances, familiarity with legal terminology, and insights into the relationship between the confederation and the Crown. Chapter IV adopts a broader perspective to examine the awareness and experiences of England's urban-maritime communities in the early years of the Hundred Years War. It also reveals the growing participation of English port towns in England's naval and fiscal systems, which raised a serious challenge to the distinctiveness of the Cinque Ports. The rhetorical use of the Portsmen's baronial image, which was treated in Chapter II, was part of an integral narrative strategy that the petitioners of the Cinque Ports skillfully used to represent themselves as the reliable and noble subjects of the king, and map their own businesses onto a larger picture of national enterprises.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMedieval English historyen_US
dc.subjectMedieval petitionsen_US
dc.subjectPolitical languageen_US
dc.subjectPolitical communicationen_US
dc.subjectMaritime townsen_US
dc.subjectSelf-representationen_US
dc.subjectCinque Portsen_US
dc.subjectMaritime historyen_US
dc.subjectMedieval English navyen_US
dc.subjectHundred Years Waren_US
dc.subject.lccDA690.C6H8
dc.subject.lcshCinque Ports (England)--Historyen
dc.subject.lcshCoasts--England--History--To 1500en
dc.subject.lcshGreat Britain--Politics and government--To 1485en
dc.titleVoices of medieval English maritime towns : petitions concerning the Cinque Ports, 1272-1377en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorChina Scholarship Council (CSC)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2026-02-25en
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 25 February 2026en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/694


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International