Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorReicher, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorRocha Santa María, Carolina Alejandra
dc.coverage.spatial444en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-02T14:47:59Z
dc.date.available2023-11-02T14:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/28622
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this thesis is providing new insights into the social influence processes that take place between bystanders. Specifically, this manuscript presents research that explores whether the perception of group norms is the key process that allows bystanders’ actions to influence the subsequent behaviour of other bystanders. This question is addressed with a multi-method approach. Studies 1 and 2 are online-survey experiments conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom (UK). They suggest that seeing ingroup members looking after others does not promote bystanders’ willingness to do the same when group norms already prescribe helping. Studies 3, 4, and 5 are online-survey experiments focused on Britons’ willingness to help asylum seekers and refugees. These studies suggest that when whether to help and how to help are contested issues, active bystandership inspires further solidarity. This phenomenon involves normative influence but also other processes, such as the perceived seriousness of the situation and bystanders’ sense of self-efficacy. Finally, Study 6 is an interview study conducted during a harshly repressed social uprising in Chile. This study shows that the shape and magnitude of social influence between bystanders vary over the evolution of emergencies. This thesis argues that bystandership involves complex sense-making processes where the behaviour of other bystanders is one of multiple tools that bystanders can use to conclude what is happening, what should be done, whether they should help, and what they are capable of. Their conclusions may also be informed by other inputs, such as lessons from their personal and social history, their social identities, pre-existing group norms, and the resources and skills that they have. Thus, social influence between bystanders is presented here as a phenomenon shaped by history, time, reflexive processes, and socially mediated perceptions of reality.   en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSocial psychologyen_US
dc.subjectBystander behaviouren_US
dc.subjectSocial influenceen_US
dc.subjectSocial normsen_US
dc.subjectGroup normsen_US
dc.titleSecondary bystandership: how primary bystanders influence the subsequent responses of othersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorAgencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2028-10-31
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 31st October 2028en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/646


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International