Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorPerrett, David Ian
dc.contributor.authorMa, Jing
dc.coverage.spatial169en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-11T15:16:23Z
dc.date.available2023-04-11T15:16:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27386
dc.description.abstractPeople agree on who should be a leader based solely on static facial images, and this naive judgement is found to predict actual leadership emergence. Although many impressions correlate with leadership success, the perceived characteristics can be mapped onto two or three dimensions: dominance, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. This thesis examines cultural differences in the association of personality judgements and leadership. Chapter 1 reviews the theoretical basis for the association between facial features and leadership, reviewing evolutionary, social identity, and leadership categorization theories. Chapters 2-4 present empirical studies of leadership impressions from the face. Chapter 2 found facial judgements of leadership can be grouped into two dimensions: a prototypical leadership dimension (sensitivity, dedication, charisma, attractiveness, intelligence, strength) and an anti-prototypical leadership dimension (tyranny, masculinity, and strength). Chapter 2 also found that leadership judgments are contextual and depend on the type of leader (business, sports, moral). Averages of faces seen as good sports leaders were rated highest on the anti-prototypical leadership dimension, while averages of faces seen as good moral leaders were rated highest on prototypical leadership dimension. Chapter 3 examined the impact of facial masculinity and prototypicality on leadership perception in UK and Chinese societies. Increase of prototypicality (own ethnicity in face shape) enhanced leadership perception, particularly in Chinese subjects. Increased facial masculinity decreased leadership perception for female faces, particularly in European subjects. Seeing one’s identity as one of a hierarchical group (collectivism) drove preference for masculinity in female leaders. Chapter 4 measured the leadership perception in real-world leadership within a Chinese corporation. The faces of male leaders were judged more mature, trustworthy, and competent looking but not more attractive than the non-leaders.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectLeadership perceptionen_US
dc.subjectFace perceptionen_US
dc.subjectLeadership perception from faceen_US
dc.subjectImplicit leadership theoryen_US
dc.subject.lccBF242.M2
dc.subject.lcshFace perceptionen
dc.subject.lcshFace--Psychological aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshLeadership--Psychological aspectsen
dc.titleLeadership impression from the face across culturesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2025-01-18
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 18th January 2025en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/397


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record