Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorMacLean, Simon
dc.contributor.advisorPalmer, James Trevor
dc.contributor.authorHouston, Cameron
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the relationship between politics and the writing of institutional history (cartularies and gesta) after the end of the Carolingian Empire (888) from the perspective of Folcuin of St-Bertin and Lobbes (fl. 948-90). After the empire collapsed, long-form narrative histories were mainly written about other centres of power than the royal court, such as religious institutions, and reflected local historical horizons as institutional identities became stronger nodes around which to write history in response to political fragmentation. This thesis nuances this view by placing Folcuin and his histories in as broad a context as possible for the first time. Chapters I and II explore how the politics of Folcuin’s oblation to the Flemish abbey of St-Bertin related to the writing of what many consider to be the first cartulary-chronicle, the Gesta abbatum Sithiensium. Folcuin’s partisanship in a hitherto unknown conflict between certain Baldwinid counts and their Unruoching relatives for power in St-Bertin and Flanders permeated the text, thus challenging the view that the earliest west Frankish cartularies necessarily created shared institutional identities in relation to reform. Chapters III and IV examine how the politics of Folcuin’s promotion to the abbacy of Lobbes and Ottonian rule in Lower Lotharingia related to the composition of the Gesta abbatum Lobiensium. Folcuin’s argument in favour of members of the Ottonian dynasty against their (pro-)Reginarid rivals for power over the abbey and region shaped his representation of monastic history, thus challenging the view that he initially wrote in response to his relations with Rather of Verona. Institutional history could offer contemporaries a means to situate themselves and their communities in a changed political landscape, not by re-establishing their identities around shared institutional pasts, but by aligning them with members of rival families, competing relatives, and still-inchoate political orders in the turbulent world of post-Carolingian politics.en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.subjectAbbey of Saint-Bertinen_US
dc.subjectAbbey of Lobbesen_US
dc.subjectWest Franciaen_US
dc.subjectCarolingian Empireen_US
dc.subjectOttonian Empireen_US
dc.subjectMedieval historiographyen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional historyen_US
dc.subjectGesta abbatumen_US
dc.subjectMedieval politicsen_US
dc.subjectMonastic reformen_US
dc.subjectMonastic historyen_US
dc.subject.lcshFolcuinus Lobiensisen
dc.subject.lcshSaint-Bertin (Monastery : Saint-Omer, Pas de Calais, France)en
dc.subject.lcshLobbes (Belgium)en
dc.subject.lcshCivilization, Medieval--Researchen
dc.subject.lcshMonasticism and religious orders--France--Historyen
dc.subject.lcshLorraine (France)--Historyen
dc.titleFolcuin and the politics of writing institutional history after the end of the Carolingian Empireen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorArts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH)en_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 15th December 2027en

The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International