Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorGomez, Juan-Carlos
dc.contributor.advisorCarpenter, Malinda
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Hao Lucy
dc.coverage.spatial192en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T16:36:02Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T16:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27082
dc.description.abstractCommon ground is seen as the basis for human communication and cooperation. Within common ground research, the main focus has always been on the knowledge that partners know together, i.e., "common knowledge". However, this neglects the factor of ignorance, which must be considered to be an integral component of common ground. To fill in this gap, different aspects of common ground (common knowledge, common ignorance, common privileged knowledge/ignorance) were investigated with a new coordination game in children between 4 and 8 years old. Results showed that common ignorance and common privileged ignorance were more difficult than common knowledge and common privileged knowledge: It was only by age 6 that children could use common ignorance at an equivalent level with common knowledge, and they had difficulty with “common privileged other knowledge” (i.e. self ignorance) even until age 8. Children’s understanding of ignorance was further probed with a preliminary investigation of strategic ignorance in children. As young as 4 years of age, children reported that they could actively choose not to know something, and from 5 years of age, adult-like reasons were given for things they preferred not to know. Common ground goes beyond common knowledge and ignorance states, and can also involve a feeling of co-presence. Whether physical co-presence in video calls could be simulated by partners using the same virtual background was investigated in an online study of adults. Results showed that using the same, as opposed to a different, background in video calls could enhance partners’ feelings of connectedness to some extent: They used a higher proportion of “we” pronouns, though they did not show a difference on other measurements such as perspective taking or mimicry. Taken together, this thesis contributes new knowledge about neglected aspects of common ground: the importance of common ignorance and its interplay with common knowledge in development, and the importance of markers of co-presence in the shared experience of online social interactions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCommon grounden_US
dc.subjectCommon ignoranceen_US
dc.subjectCoordination gameen_US
dc.subjectStrategic ignoranceen_US
dc.subjectCo-presenceen_US
dc.subjectVideo call interactionsen_US
dc.subject.lccBF311.L58
dc.subject.lcshPsychology, Cognitiveen
dc.subject.lcshCommunication--Psychological aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshCognition in childrenen
dc.subject.lcshCollective behavioren
dc.titleVarieties of common ground : common knowledge, common ignorance, and co-presenceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorChina Scholarship Council (CSC)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrewsen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2025-11-01
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 1st November 2025en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/315
dc.identifier.grantnumber201703780013en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record