Files in this item
Public botanic gardens and the early institutionalisation of science : Edinburgh, Florence, and Pisa in the second half of the eighteenth century
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Easterby-Smith, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Fyfe, Aileen | |
dc.contributor.author | Romero-Passerin d'Entreves, Elena | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 229 p. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-04T09:42:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-04T09:42:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-16 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/26302 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis is a comparative study of four botanic gardens in Scotland and Tuscany in the second half of the eighteenth century. Taking an approach based on case studies, it argues that botanic gardens were early examples of specialisation, professionalisation, and institutionalisation of science. The existing historiography on the topic has tended to focus on large and famous institutions which enjoyed excellent social and economic resources. By examining gardens at the margins of the largest Enlightenment science centres, the thesis shows that there were European trends in the evolution of botanical and scientific institutions at the time. Despite many differences in their political, economic, and climatic situations, the comparison of the botanic gardens of Edinburgh, Florence, and Pisa reveals striking similarities in their development as institutions in the second half of the century. The thesis explores three main themes: the management of space, the status of staff, and the place of the gardens in a wider public infrastructure. It shows that, though their responses to each theme sometimes differed, the gardens grappled with the same questions and followed similar trends. The space of the gardens was fashioned by and dedicated to scientific activities in a way that gave an increasingly precise definition to the concept of science, one that included research and excluded other forms of knowledge practices. The status of the people in charge of the gardens came to be more clearly defined and made them rare figures of professionals of science in the eighteenth century. Finally, an increase in funding and control by public authorities gave the gardens a mission to serve the public good through the practice of science. By examining these trends in all three cities, the thesis shows how specialisation, professionalisation and institutionalisation of science developed in botanic gardens of the eighteenth century. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of St Andrews | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Botanic Garden | en_US |
dc.subject | Botany | en_US |
dc.subject | Britain | en_US |
dc.subject | Scotland | en_US |
dc.subject | Italy | en_US |
dc.subject | Tuscany | en_US |
dc.subject | Eighteenth century | en_US |
dc.subject | History of science | en_US |
dc.subject | History of institutions | en_US |
dc.subject | Professionalisation | en_US |
dc.subject | Italian history | en_US |
dc.subject | Peter-Leopold of Tuscany | en_US |
dc.subject | George III | en_US |
dc.subject | Scientific specialisation | en_US |
dc.subject | Scottish history | en_US |
dc.subject | Edinburgh | en_US |
dc.subject | Florence | en_US |
dc.subject | Pisa | en_US |
dc.subject | Garden history | en_US |
dc.subject | History of botany | en_US |
dc.subject | History of Tuscany | en_US |
dc.title | Public botanic gardens and the early institutionalisation of science : Edinburgh, Florence, and Pisa in the second half of the eighteenth century | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Scottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH) | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/219 |
The following licence files are associated with this item:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.