Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorEasterby-Smith, Sarah
dc.contributor.advisorFyfe, Aileen
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Passerin d'Entreves, Elena
dc.coverage.spatial229 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T09:42:27Z
dc.date.available2022-11-04T09:42:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26302
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is a comparative study of four botanic gardens in Scotland and Tuscany in the second half of the eighteenth century. Taking an approach based on case studies, it argues that botanic gardens were early examples of specialisation, professionalisation, and institutionalisation of science. The existing historiography on the topic has tended to focus on large and famous institutions which enjoyed excellent social and economic resources. By examining gardens at the margins of the largest Enlightenment science centres, the thesis shows that there were European trends in the evolution of botanical and scientific institutions at the time. Despite many differences in their political, economic, and climatic situations, the comparison of the botanic gardens of Edinburgh, Florence, and Pisa reveals striking similarities in their development as institutions in the second half of the century. The thesis explores three main themes: the management of space, the status of staff, and the place of the gardens in a wider public infrastructure. It shows that, though their responses to each theme sometimes differed, the gardens grappled with the same questions and followed similar trends. The space of the gardens was fashioned by and dedicated to scientific activities in a way that gave an increasingly precise definition to the concept of science, one that included research and excluded other forms of knowledge practices. The status of the people in charge of the gardens came to be more clearly defined and made them rare figures of professionals of science in the eighteenth century. Finally, an increase in funding and control by public authorities gave the gardens a mission to serve the public good through the practice of science. By examining these trends in all three cities, the thesis shows how specialisation, professionalisation and institutionalisation of science developed in botanic gardens of the eighteenth century.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBotanic Gardenen_US
dc.subjectBotanyen_US
dc.subjectBritainen_US
dc.subjectScotlanden_US
dc.subjectItalyen_US
dc.subjectTuscanyen_US
dc.subjectEighteenth centuryen_US
dc.subjectHistory of scienceen_US
dc.subjectHistory of institutionsen_US
dc.subjectProfessionalisationen_US
dc.subjectItalian historyen_US
dc.subjectPeter-Leopold of Tuscanyen_US
dc.subjectGeorge IIIen_US
dc.subjectScientific specialisationen_US
dc.subjectScottish historyen_US
dc.subjectEdinburghen_US
dc.subjectFlorenceen_US
dc.subjectPisaen_US
dc.subjectGarden historyen_US
dc.subjectHistory of botanyen_US
dc.subjectHistory of Tuscanyen_US
dc.titlePublic botanic gardens and the early institutionalisation of science : Edinburgh, Florence, and Pisa in the second half of the eighteenth centuryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/219


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International