Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |
Steps to acquiring godhood: ritual and divinity in Seneca's Medea
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Buckley, Emma | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Anderson, Ralph Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Giamarellou Bourmpouli, Eleni Alexandra | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 158 p. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T15:03:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-17T15:03:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-07-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/23380 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis argues for the importance of ritual and analyzes its use in Seneca’s Medea, emphasizing Act 4’s importance and its relevance for understanding Medea’s actions and identity in Act 5. I employ the ritual methodologies of Catherine Bell and Bruce Kapferer, and broader context of Roman religion, to argue that Medea uses ritual to transform herself, culminating in sacrificial murders which make her a divinity, escaping the mortal realm by the end of the play. Focusing first on prayer, I exhibit how it structures the mortal’s position with respect to divinities according to a recognizably ‘lived’ experience of its first century CE audience. Subsequently, I show how the magic ritual of Act 4 portrays Medea as a powerful sorceress and actively stages ritual to augment her existing power, entering her into the divine realm. I emphasize her divine heritage and special bond with Hecate as crucial factors to her success. Lastly, I posit that the child-murders of Act 5 function as a sacrifice that re-integrates Medea with her birth family, severs her from mortal community, and designates her as a vengeful deity. I build upon Senecan scholarship by suggesting a progressive arc for the play and treating ritual seriously. My work faces ritual as lived experience, one demanding the full engagement of the participant’s mind and matter. Contextualizing within Roman religion, I explore how ritual functions as a communication method between humans and gods. This ritual analysis also illuminates the interconnectedness of magic and public cult, casting doubt on the dominant assumption that any ritual performed in isolation is magical. Furthermore, I analyze the sacrificial murders to comment on perversion in Roman religion. I thus show the play’s embeddedness in early Imperial Rome’s culture and indicate that Seneca uses this to speak to the terrifying concept of abusing power. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Ritual | en_US |
dc.subject | Medea | en_US |
dc.subject | Senecan tragedy | en_US |
dc.subject | Sacrifice | en_US |
dc.subject | Divinity | en_US |
dc.subject | Magic ritual | en_US |
dc.subject | Roman lived experience | en_US |
dc.subject | Prayer | en_US |
dc.subject | Ritual perversion | en_US |
dc.subject | Abuse of power | en_US |
dc.subject | Seneca's Medea Act 4 | en_US |
dc.subject | Seneca's Medea Act 5 | en_US |
dc.subject | Seneca's Medea | en_US |
dc.subject | Mortal and divine relations | en_US |
dc.subject | Early Imperial Rome | en_US |
dc.subject | Public cult | en_US |
dc.subject | Ritual methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | Roman religion | en_US |
dc.subject | Apotheosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Ritual as lived experience | en_US |
dc.subject.lcc | PA6664.M4G5 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Medea, consort of Aegeus, King of Athens (Mythological character)--In literature | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Seneca, Lucius Annaeus, ca. 4 B.C.-65 A.D. Medea | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Ritual in literature | en |
dc.title | Steps to acquiring godhood: ritual and divinity in Seneca's Medea | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | MPhil Master of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2026-06-03 | |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Thesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 03 June 2026 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/75 |
The following licence files are associated with this item:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.