Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHarrison, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorConroy, Laura Maree
dc.coverage.spatialx, 250 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-05T09:15:26Z
dc.date.available2021-06-05T09:15:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23314
dc.description.abstractAlthough the majority of recent scholarship on Alexander the Great agrees that he adopted Achaemenid practice, the nature and extent of this influence is disputed. This thesis therefore offers an original, comprehensive evaluation of the influence of Achaemenid royal ideology and court practice on Alexander. Through the comparison of the traditional Greco-Roman literary tradition with contemporary Persian and Near-Eastern sources (in particular cuneiform inscriptions), this study seeks to better understand the nature of, and reasons for, Alexander’s gradual shift towards Persian culture. To this end, parallels between Alexander’s behaviours and key elements of Achaemenid royal ideology—including emulation of earlier Kings, divine bestowal of kingship, emphasis on truth and the Lie, relationships with nature, the centrality of reward and punishment to court culture, and attempts at integration and unity through marriage and banqueting—are explored. This thesis also demonstrates how Alexander fits into a wider narrative of Persian decadence and degeneration stereotypical of the Greek literary tradition. Ultimately, this thesis concludes that Alexander consciously and actively adopted elements of Achaemenid royal ideology and court practice to augment power gained through conquest of Persia and the Near East. This does not mean that he sought to be an Achaemenid King in his own right; rather, he recognised the centrality of this ideology to local populations accepting his authority and the legitimacy of his rule.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This thesis was funded by a number of generous donors including the University of St Andrews School of Classics (Rafferty and Ronald M Smith Trust Scholarships), School of Economics (May Wong Smith Trust Scholarship) and St Leonard’s College (7 Century Scholarship). I also wish to thank the University of St Andrews International Student Hardship Fund, the Sportula Europe, and New Classicists (in conjunction with the Classical Association) for their financial support in the final year of my studies." -- Acknowledgementsen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAlexander the Greaten_US
dc.subjectAchaemeniden_US
dc.subjectIdeologyen_US
dc.subjectCourt practiceen_US
dc.subjectHellenisticen_US
dc.subjectMacedonianen_US
dc.subject.lccDF234.2C7
dc.subject.lcshAlexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C.en
dc.subject.lcshAchaemenid dynasty, 559-330 B.C.--Influenceen
dc.subject.lcshCivilization, Ancient--Iranian influencesen
dc.titleThe influence of Achaemenid royal ideology and court practice on Alexander the Greaten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Classicsen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Economics and Financeen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. St Leonard's Collegeen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2025-12-11
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 11th December 2025en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/68


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record