Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHesk, Jon
dc.contributor.advisorBuckley, Emma
dc.contributor.authorMcLaren, Colin Andrew
dc.coverage.spatialxi, 228 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T15:35:43Z
dc.date.available2020-06-18T15:35:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/20103
dc.description.abstractThe dissertation examines representations of Idomeneus, and of the myths and traditions associated with him, in Graeco-Roman literature, and their reception in the West (represented by Italy, France, Germany and England). It takes the following form: Chapter 1, the representations and their cultural significance; Chapter 2, the representation of Idomeneus in the Iliad; Chapter 3, accretive representations of Idomeneus, principally from Late Antiquity; Chapter 4, the transmission of the accretive representations to the West, their accessibility through vernacular translation and their assimilation in contemporary literature; Chapter 5, the transmission of the Iliadic representation of Idomeneus to the West, through the publication of the epic, first in an academic format, latterly as polite literature; Chapter 6, the association of Iliadic and accretive representations in literature and drama between 1699 and 1720; Chapter 7, summary and conclusion. The dissertation addresses hitherto under-explored issues in the representation of Idomeneus. These include his limitations as an aristos in the Iliad; his gradual detachment from his associate, Meriones; his prominence in the English ‘interlude’, Horestes (1567); his treatment in Italian and French burlesque of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; his representation in fin-dix-septième French drama; and in Alexander Pope’s enlightened character study of 1720. These are supplemented by assessments of the impact of authorial/editorial omissions, paraphrases and interpolations on the representations; and of Idomeneus’ visibility in text, paratext and early ‘books of reference’, compared with that of his fellow-aristoi, the Aiantes, Diomedes, Nestor and Odysseus.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectClassical receptionen_US
dc.subjectClassical traditionen_US
dc.subjectClassical literature in translationen_US
dc.subject.lccBL820.I37M36
dc.subject.lcshIdomeneus (Greek mythology)en
dc.subject.lcshIdomeneus (Greek mythology) in literatureen
dc.subject.lcshClassical literature--Influenceen
dc.subject.lcshClassical literature--Translations--History and criticismen
dc.titleRepresentations of Idomeneus in Graeco-Roman sources and their reception in the West, to 1720en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2023-06-10
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Electronic copy restricted until 10th June 2023en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-20103


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record